Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareEmergency and Acute Care Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Use of Delayed Telephone Informed Consent for Observational Emergency Medicine Research Is Ethical and Effective

Open access
Offerman, Steven R., Nishijima, Daniel K., Ballard, Dustin W., Chetipally, Uli K., Vinson, David R., Holmes, James F.·2013·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to describe the rate of successful consent using an altered (deferred telephone) consent process in emergency department (ED) patients. Methods: This study evaluated the consent process employed during a prospective, multicenter, observational study of outcomes in anticoagulated patients with blunt head trauma. The study was approved by the institutional review boards (IRB s) at all participating centers. Patients were not informed of the study during their enrollment at their index ED visit. Patient names, clinical findings, and contact information were collected at the time of initial ED visits. The patients or their legally designated surrogates were contacted by telephone at least 14 days after ED discharge, given all the elements of informed consent, and then consented for study participation. Study results are presented with simple descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 506 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 75.8 (±12.2) years including 274 female subjects (54.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 49.7% to 58.6%) were enrolled into the study. Patients or their surrogates were successfully contacted by telephone in 501 of 506 cases (99.0%; 95% CI = 97.7% to 99.7%). Consent was obtained in 500 of 501 cases at time of telephone follow‐up (99.8%; 95% CI = 98.9% to 100.0%). Surrogates provided consent in 199 cases (39.7%; 95% CI = 35.4% to 44.2%). Median time from ED visit to phone contact was 21 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 17 to 27 days). The median number of phone attempts for successful contact was 1 (IQR = 1 to 2 attempts). Conclusions: The authors achieved a very high rate of successful telephone follow‐up in this predominantly older ED population. Obtaining consent to participate in a research study using a deferred telephone contact process was effective and well received by both subjects and surrogates. IRB s should consider deferred telephone consent for minimal‐risk studies requiring telephone follow‐up, as opposed to a consent process requiring written documentation at the time of initial ED visit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.12117

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979, Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Offerman, S. R., Nishijima, D. K., Ballard, D. W., Chetipally, U. K., Vinson, D. R., & Holmes, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland CA
Corresponding author
Holmes, James F.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
403-407
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2028900175
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024146)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (L30 TR000286)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
anticoagulated patients, blunt head trauma, surrogate consent, research participation rates, telephone follow-up, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Emergency Medicine, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Male, Prospective Studies, Telephone, Time Factors, Head Injuries, Closed, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Delayed Telephone Informed Consent for Observational Emergency Medicine Research Is Ethical and Effective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/acem.12117
The paper
Offerman, S. R., Nishijima, D. K., Ballard, D. W., Chetipally, U. K., Vinson, D. R., & Holmes, J. F. (2013). The Use of Delayed Telephone Informed Consent for Observational Emergency Medicine Research Is Ethical and Effective. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.