Cited by 51Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Attentional alterations in alcohol dependence are underpinned by specific executive control deficits.

Maurage, Pierre, de Timary, Philippe, Billieux, Joël, Collignon, Marie, Heeren, Alexandre·2014·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background Attentional biases and deficits play a central role in the development and maintenance of alcohol dependence, but the underlying attentional processes accounting for these deficits have been very little explored. Importantly, the differential alterations across the 3 attentional networks (alerting, orienting, and executive control) remain unclear in this pathology. Methods Thirty recently detoxified alcohol-dependent individuals and 30 paired controls completed the Attention Network Test, which allow exploring the attentional alterations specifically related to the 3 attentional networks. Results Alcohol-dependent individuals presented globally delayed reaction times compared to controls. More centrally, they showed a differential deficit across attention networks, with a preserved performance for alerting and orienting networks but impaired executive control (p Conclusions These results suggest that attentional alterations in alcohol dependence are centrally due to a specific alteration of executive control. Intervention programs focusing on executive components of attention should be promoted, and these results support the frontal lobe hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acer.12444

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 51

Authors
Maurage, P., de Timary, P., Billieux, J., Collignon, M., & Heeren, A.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Laboratory for Experimental Psychopathology; Psychological Sciences Research Institute; Université Catholique de Louvain; Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium
Corresponding author
Maurage, Pierre
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-20
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
2105-2112
ISSN
0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158786482
Cited by
51
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Belgian Fund for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
alcoholism, executive function, attentional networks, alerting network, orienting network, attentional bias, reaction time, detoxification
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review