Cited by 434Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Simultaneous versus concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis in the National Alcohol Survey

Open access
Subbaraman, Meenakshi S., Kerr, William C.·2015·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: Cannabis is the most commonly used drug among those who drink, yet no study has directly compared those who use cannabis and alcohol simultaneously versus concurrently (i.e., separately) in the adult general population. Here, we assess differences in demographics, alcohol‐related social consequences, harms to self, and drunk driving across simultaneous, concurrent, and alcohol‐only using groups. Methods: Secondary analyses of the 2005 and 2010 National Alcohol Survey ( N = 8,626; 4,522 female, 4,104 male), a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview survey of individuals aged 18 and older from all 50 states and DC. Blacks and Hispanics are over‐sampled. Data were collected using list‐assisted Random Digit Dialing. Multinomial and multivariable logistic regressions were used for analyses. Results: The prevalence of simultaneous use was almost twice as high as concurrent use, implying that individuals who use both cannabis and alcohol tend to use them at the same time. Furthermore, simultaneous use was associated with increased frequency and quantity of alcohol use. Simultaneous use was also the most detrimental: compared to alcohol only, simultaneous use approximately doubled the odds of drunk driving, social consequences, and harms to self. The magnitudes of differences in problems remained when comparing drunk driving among simultaneous users to concurrent users. Conclusions: The overall set of results is particularly important to bear in mind when studying and/or treating problems among alcohol/cannabis co‐users because they demonstrate that in the general population, co‐users are a heterogeneous group who experience different likelihoods of problems relative to co‐use patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acer.12698

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problems are exacerbated when individuals use both substances compared to independent use.

    “In general, problems are exacerbated when individuals use both substances compared to independent use (Shillington & Clapp, 2006; Subbaraman & Kerr, 2015).”

    From Examining the Prospective Associations Between Mindfulness Facets and Substance Use in Emerging Adulthood. (2021) · cites this paper as Subbaraman & Kerr, 2015

    The Discussion’s Key findings report that simultaneous alcohol-and-cannabis users had higher odds of drunk driving, social consequences, and harms to self than alcohol-only users. The broader claim does not preserve the paper’s distinction between simultaneous and concurrent use: concurrent users did not have higher odds of drunk driving or harms than alcohol-only users. The paper reports associations, not that using both substances caused problems to worsen. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 434

Authors
Subbaraman, M. S., & Kerr, W. C.
Affiliations
Public Health Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Subbaraman, Meenakshi S.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
872-879
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W1998025697
Cited by
434
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA021742 and P50-AA005595)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
alcohol-cannabis co-use, alcohol use patterns, drunk driving, National Alcohol Survey, cannabis use
MeSH terms
Driving Under the Influence, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior, Herb-Drug Interactions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review