Cited by 68Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFace Recognition and Perception

A systematic review of visual processing and associated treatments in body dysmorphic disorder

Beilharz, F., Castle, D. J., Grace, S., Rossell, S. L.·2017·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Recent advances in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have explored abnormal visual processing, yet it is unclear how this relates to treatment. The aim of this study was to summarize our current understanding of visual processing in BDD and review associated treatments. Method: The literature was collected through PsycInfo and PubMed. Visual processing articles were included if written in English after 1970, had a specific BDD group compared to healthy controls and were not case studies. Due to the lack of research regarding treatments associated with visual processing, case studies were included. Results: A number of visual processing abnormalities are present in BDD, including face recognition, emotion identification, aesthetics, object recognition and gestalt processing. Differences to healthy controls include a dominance of detailed local processing over global processing and associated changes in brain activation in visual regions. Perceptual mirror retraining and some forms of self‐exposure have demonstrated improved treatment outcomes, but have not been examined in isolation from broader treatments. Conclusion: Despite these abnormalities in perception, particularly concerning face and emotion recognition, few BDD treatments attempt to specifically remediate this. The development of a novel visual training programme which addresses these widespread abnormalities may provide an effective treatment modality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12705

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Their results influence the understanding of BDD and the planning of therapeutic work.

    “Eredményeik a BDD megértését és a terápiás munka tervezését is befolyásolják (Beilharz, Castle, Grace és Rossell, 2017).”

    From A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai (2023) · cites this paper as Beilharz, Castle, Grace és Rossell, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beilharz, F., Castle, D. J., Grace, S., & Rossell, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Beilharz, F.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-12
Volume
136
Issue
1
Pages
16-36
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2586403597
Cited by
68
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
body dysmorphic disorder, visual processing, face recognition (cognition), emotion recognition, aesthetic perception, object recognition, local versus global processing, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Humans, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Body Dysmorphic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review