Snus use and cardiovascular risk factors in the general population: the HUNT3 study
Abstract
Background and aims Snus, a form of smokeless tobacco, is increasingly popular in its traditional Nordic markets, and was recently launched commercially in the United States. We examined the cross-sectional associations between snus use and cardiovascular risk factors, and compared them with the corresponding associations of smoking. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The HUNT3 general population survey, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway (2006-08). Participants A general population sample of n = 25 163. Measurements Measured triglyceride,- glucose- and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, blood pressure and waist circumference, registry information on gender, age and education level, self-reported snus use, smoking, physical exercise and alcohol use. Findings In age- and gender-adjusted linear regression analyses, extensive snus use was associated with larger waist circumference (b = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.86, 2.43) and higher systolic blood pressure (b = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.48, 3.68), but with higher rather than lower levels of HDL-cholesterol (b = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.79, 2.53). These three differences remained significant after additional adjustment for smoking, education level, physical exercise and alcohol use. Smokers had higher triglyceride and lower HDL-cholesterol than snus users, but lower systolic blood pressure. Conclusions After adjusting statistically for major confounding variables, Norwegians who use snus extensively have a mixed profile in terms of cardiovascular ri…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive snus users have larger waist circumference (b = 1.65; 95% CI: 0.86-2.43) and higher levels of HDL-cholesterol (b = 1.66; 95% CI: 0.79-2.53).
“larger waist circumference (b = 1.65; 95% CI: 0.86-2.43)and higher levels of HDL-cholesterol (b = 1.66; 95% CI: 0.79-2.53)among extensive snus users (Øverland et al. 2013).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Øverland et al. 2013
Extensive snus users have higher systolic blood pressure (b = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.48-3.68).
“identified higher systolic blood pressure (b = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.48-3.68)among extensive snus users (Øverland et al. 2013).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Øverland et al. 2013
Cites
Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women
Bansal, S., Buring, J. E., Rifai, N., Mora, S., Sacks, F. M., & Ridker, P. M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.309 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
Cohort Profile: The HUNT Study, Norway
Krokstad, S., Langhammer, A., Hveem, K., Holmen, T., Midthjell, K., Stene, T., Bratberg, G., Heggland, J., & Holmen, J. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys095 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Smoking cessation and weight gain
Filozof, C., Fernández Pinilla, M. C., & Fernández‐Cruz, A. (2004) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2004.00131.x · Cited by 519 · see citing works
The Health Status of Nonparticipants in a Population-based Health Study: The Hordaland Health Study
Knudsen, A. K., Hotopf, M., Skogen, J. C., Overland, S., & Mykletun, A. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq257 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Self-citationBoffetta, P., & Straif, K. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b3060 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Øverland, S., Skogen, J. C., Lissner, L., Bjerkeset, O., Tjora, T., & Stewart, R.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-28
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2019-2028
- ISSN
- 0965-2140
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review