The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Governmental standard drink definitions and low‐risk alcohol consumption guidelines in 37 countries
Open accessAbstract
Background and Aims: One of the challenges of international alcohol research and policy is the variability in and lack of knowledge of how governments in different nations define a standard drink and low‐risk drinking. This study gathered such information from governmental agencies in 37 countries. Methods: A pool of 75 countries that might have definitions was created using World Health Organization (WHO) information and the authors' own judgement. Structured internet searches of relevant terms for each country were supplemented by efforts to contact government agencies directly and to consult with alcohol experts in the country. Results: Most of the 75 national governments examined were not identified as having adopted a standard drink definition. Among the 37 that were so identified, the modal standard drink size was 10 g pure ethanol, but variation was wide (8–20 g). Significant variability was also evident for low‐risk drinking guidelines, ranging from 10–42 g per day for women and 10–56 g per day for men to 98–140 g per week for women and 150–280 g per week for men. Conclusions: Researchers working and communicating across national boundaries should be sensitive to the substantial variability in ‘standard’ drink definitions and low‐risk drinking guidelines. The potential impact of guidelines, both in general and in specific national cases, remains an important question for public health research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Riazi, K., Azhari, H., Charette, J. H., Underwood, F. E., King, J. A., Afshar, E. E., Swain, M. G., Congly, S. E., Kaplan, G. G., & Shaheen, A.-A. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00165-0 · Cited by 2,246
Wood, A. M., Kaptoge, S., Butterworth, A. S., Willeit, P., Warnakula, S., Bolton, T., Paige, E., Paul, D. S., Sweeting, M., Burgess, S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30134-x · Cited by 1,188
Bryazka, D., Reitsma, M. B., Griswold, M. G., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abbasi-Kangevari, Z., Abdoli, A., Abdollahi, M., Abdullah, A. Y. M., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00847-9 · Cited by 582
Association of Habitual Alcohol Intake With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Biddinger, K. J., Emdin, C. A., Haas, M. E., Wang, M., Hindy, G., Ellinor, P. T., Kathiresan, S., Khera, A. V., & Aragam, K. G. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3849 · Cited by 445
Higgins-Biddle, J. C., & Babor, T. F. (2018) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1456545 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalinowski, A., & Humphreys, K.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1293-1298
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2341280085
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governmental standard drink definitions and low‐risk alcohol consumption guidelines in 37 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/add.13341
- The paper
- Kalinowski, A., & Humphreys, K. (2016). Governmental standard drink definitions and low‐risk alcohol consumption guidelines in 37 countries. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.