Impacts of Canada's cannabis legalization on police‐reported crime among youth: early evidence
Abstract
AIMS: Canada's 2018 Cannabis Act allows youth (age 12-17 years) to possess up to 5 g of dried cannabis (or equivalent) for personal consumption/sharing. This study assessed whether the Cannabis Act was associated with changes in police-reported cannabis offences among youth in Canada. DESIGN: Time series model using national daily criminal incident data from January 1, 2015-December 31, 2018 from the Canadian Uniform Crime Reporting Survey (UCR-2). Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average time series models, stratified by sex, assessed the relations between legalization and youth cannabis-related offences. SETTING: Canada, 2015-2018. CASES: Police-reported cannabis-related offenses among youth age 12-17 years (male, n = 32 178; female, n = 9001). MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes: police-reported cannabis-related crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes. Covariate: calendar-month. FINDINGS: For females, legalization was associated with a step-effect decrease of 4.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.32, 5.81; P < 0.001) police-reported cannabis-related criminal offences per day, an effect equivalent to a 64.6% (standard error [SE] = 33.5%) reduction. For males, legalization was associated with a drop of 12.73 (95% CI = 8.82, 16.64; P < 0.001) cannabis-related offences per day, equaling a decrease of 57.7% (SE = 22.6%). Results were inconclusive as to whether there were associations between cannabis legalization and patterns of property crimes or violent crimes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Cannabis Act in Canada in 2018 appears to have been associated with decreases of 55%-65% in cannabis-related crimes among male and female youth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While one study suggested minimal decreases for substance-use related arrests in adults, the findings were not consistent across the two studies examining arrest-rates in youth.
“While one study did suggest minimal decreases for substance-use related arrests in adults, the findings were not consistent across the two studies examining arrest-rates in youth.100-102”
From The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farrelly, K. N., Wardell, J. D., Marsden, E., Scarfe, M. L., Najdzionek, P., Turna, J., & MacKillop, J. (2023) · Substance Abuse Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/11782218231172054 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Callaghan, R. C., Vander Heiden, J., Sanches, M., Asbridge, M., Hathaway, A., & Kish, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Northern Medical Program University of Northern British Columbia Prince George Canada
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Callaghan, Russell C.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3454-3462
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W3165450682
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 13.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CU3–163011)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Keywords
- cannabis legalization, Cannabis Act, police-reported crime, property crime, violent crime, sex differences, drug policy, Canada
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Canada, Cannabis, Child, Crime, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Police
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review