Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ion release from calcium and fluoride containing dental varnishes

Cochrane, NJ, Shen, P, Yuan, Y, Reynolds, EC·2014·Australian Dental Journal

Abstract

Background: A range of dental varnishes have been commercialized recently that contain calcium and inorganic phosphate in addition to fluoride. The aim of this study was to analyse the fluoride, calcium and inorganic phosphate ion release from: (1) MI Varnish containing casein phosphopeptide‐amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP‐ACP); (2) Clinpro White containing functionalized tricalcium phosphate (fTCP); (3) Enamel Pro containing amorphous calcium phosphate; (4) Bifluorid 5 containing calcium fluoride; and (5) Duraphat (no added calcium control). Methods: The varnishes were applied to a standardized surface area of polyvinyl chloride (n = 7 per group) and immersed in 25 g of distilled deionized water which was changed at 1, 4, 24, 72 and 168 hours. The ion release was determined by ion chromatography and expressed as μmol (cumulative) per gram of varnish. Results: All varnishes released measurable fluoride and calcium, however only MI Varnish and Enamel Pro released significant levels of inorganic phosphate. At 24 hours the order of cumulative fluoride release was: 1>3>4>2=5 with 1 significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the rest. At 72 and 168 hours, the cumulative calcium release was: 1>4>3>2=5 with 1 significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the rest. Conclusions: MI Varnish containing CPP‐ACP had the highest release of calcium and fluoride ions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/adj.12144

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1177/0022034510376046 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10853-008-3068-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0272-8842(95)00126-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/00220345950740060601 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/00220345970760091101 · DOI
  6. Schmidt HF, 1969, The fluoride varnish procedure and possibilities of its utilization for the prevention of caries, Zahnarztl Mitt, 59, 633
  7. 10.1159/000325166 · DOI
  8. Cate JM, 1994, In situ models, physico‐chemical aspects, Adv Dent Res, 8, 125, 10.1177/08959374940080020201 · DOI
  9. 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0053 · DOI
  10. 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0141 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/0895937409335643 · DOI
  12. Schemehorn BR, 2011, Comparison of fluoride uptake into tooth enamel from two fluoride varnishes containing different calcium phosphate sources, J Clin Dent, 22, 51
  13. 10.1177/154405910608500911 · DOI
  14. 10.3109/00016358809004784 · DOI
  15. Cochrane NJ, 2009, Food constituents and oral health: current status and future prospects
  16. 10.1177/154405910808700420 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/154405910808700513 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Cochrane, N., Shen, P., Yuan, Y., & Reynolds, E.
Venue
Australian Dental Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-04
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
100-105
ISSN
  • 0045-0421
  • 1834-7819
Cited by
90
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review