Cited by 134Agricultural economics and policiesEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsClimate change impacts on agriculture

Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields

Brunelle, T., Dumas, P., Souty, F., Dorin, B., Nadaud, F.·2015·Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Because of tensions on fossil energy and phosphorus markets, the rise in fertilizer prices observed during the last decades may continue in the future, putting into question production pathways relying heavily on crop intensification. To evaluate how, in this context, economic choices may alter crop yields, we first construct different fertilizer price scenarios to 2050 based on an econometric relation with oil and gas prices. Other possible scenarios, such as the continuation of historical trends, are also considered. The resulting changes in fertilizer price range between +0.8% and +3.6% per year over the 2005–2050 period. These scenarios are tested in a global land‐use model incorporating an endogenous representation of the land–fertilizer substitution. We find that the supply‐side response to rising fertilizer prices could lower crop yields in 2050 from −6% to −13%, with a corresponding increase in global cropland area ranging between 100 and 240 Mha if the demand for food and nonfood products has to be met. The sensitivity of these results is tested with regard to assumptions on food consumption, change in potential yield and nutrient use efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/agec.12161

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brunelle, T., Dumas, P., Souty, F., Dorin, B., & Nadaud, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
  • Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Brunelle, T.
Venue
Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-31
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
653-666
ISSN
  • 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-0862
OpenAlex
W2101400178
Cited by
134
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
  • GIS Climat Environnement Société ACACCYA project
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
fertilizer prices, crop yield, oil and gas prices, cropland expansion, food demand, nutrient use efficiency, crop intensification, climate change scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review