Cited by 5Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Use of Guanfacine for Cannabis Use Disorder and Related Symptomology

Holst, Manuela, Mathai, David S., Patel, Marguerite M., Rodgman, Christopher, Keller, Jake, Hussain, Mariyah Z., De La Garza, Richard, Kosten, Thomas R. +1 more·2019·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

Background and objectives No medication has Food and Drug Administration approval for cannabis use disorder (CUD), and most medication development focuses on the withdrawal syndrome. We evaluated the effects of short-term treatment using the α-2A-adrenergic receptor agonist, guanfacine, on withdrawal symptoms in volunteers with CUD and a history of early onset of cannabis use. Methods Non-treatment-seeking healthy volunteers (n = 7) who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition criteria for CUD participated in a two-phase, within-subjects study. Volunteers received placebo or guanfacine (3 mg/day) for the first 8-day inpatient study and the alternative medication for the second 8-day inpatient study. On day 1 of both treatment periods, participants received 30 mg of synthetic Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol for standardization of abstinence onset. On days 2 to 7, participants received study medication. Cannabis withdrawal symptoms, sleep, craving, and physiology were assessed on all inpatient days. Results Compared with placebo, guanfacine did not show significant effects on withdrawal, craving, or sleep, although there were trends for guanfacine to increase positive mood symptoms and decrease craving-associated compulsivity. Discussion and conclusions Compared with former studies, we could not prove significant improvement in sleep or decrease of negative symptoms, but we found trends for increased positive mood symptoms. Our data did not show sign…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajad.12959

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 5

Authors
Holst, M., Mathai, D. S., Patel, M. M., Rodgman, C., Keller, J., Hussain, M. Z., De La Garza, R., Kosten, T. R., & Verrico, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center & Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
Corresponding author
Holst, Manuela
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-04
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
455-464
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W2971806944
Cited by
5
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
guanfacine, cannabis use disorder, craving, sleep, compulsivity, early-onset cannabis use
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Dronabinol, Single-Blind Method, Guanfacine, Young Adult, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review