Use of Guanfacine for Cannabis Use Disorder and Related Symptomology
Abstract
Background and objectives No medication has Food and Drug Administration approval for cannabis use disorder (CUD), and most medication development focuses on the withdrawal syndrome. We evaluated the effects of short-term treatment using the α-2A-adrenergic receptor agonist, guanfacine, on withdrawal symptoms in volunteers with CUD and a history of early onset of cannabis use. Methods Non-treatment-seeking healthy volunteers (n = 7) who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition criteria for CUD participated in a two-phase, within-subjects study. Volunteers received placebo or guanfacine (3 mg/day) for the first 8-day inpatient study and the alternative medication for the second 8-day inpatient study. On day 1 of both treatment periods, participants received 30 mg of synthetic Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol for standardization of abstinence onset. On days 2 to 7, participants received study medication. Cannabis withdrawal symptoms, sleep, craving, and physiology were assessed on all inpatient days. Results Compared with placebo, guanfacine did not show significant effects on withdrawal, craving, or sleep, although there were trends for guanfacine to increase positive mood symptoms and decrease craving-associated compulsivity. Discussion and conclusions Compared with former studies, we could not prove significant improvement in sleep or decrease of negative symptoms, but we found trends for increased positive mood symptoms. Our data did not show sign…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are mixed results regarding guanfacine's effects on cannabis withdrawal symptoms.
“although there are mixed results regarding its effects on withdrawal symptoms (Haney et al., 2019, Holst et al., 2019)”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Holst et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Holst, M., Mathai, D. S., Patel, M. M., Rodgman, C., Keller, J., Hussain, M. Z., De La Garza, R., Kosten, T. R., & Verrico, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center & Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
- Corresponding author
- Holst, Manuela
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal on Addictions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-09-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 455-464
- ISSN
- 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0391
- OpenAlex
- W2971806944
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- guanfacine, cannabis use disorder, craving, sleep, compulsivity, early-onset cannabis use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Dronabinol, Single-Blind Method, Guanfacine, Young Adult, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists, Craving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review