Are Individual Investors Uninformed? Evidence from Trading Behaviors by Heterogeneous Investors around Unfaithful Corporate Disclosure
Abstract
This paper examines the trading behaviors of individual investors as well as domestic and foreign institutional investors around a unique corporate event: unfaithful disclosure (non‐disclosure, canceling disclosure and changing disclosure of a firm's material information). Our study relied on the daily trading data of different groups of investors in Korea's stock market. We found that the market reacts negatively toward announcements on forewarnings of unfaithful disclosure by the Korea Exchange as well as toward the confirmation of the forewarnings. Further, our finding indicates that firms that are proved to be responsible for the unfaithful disclosure tend to perform poorly prior to the announcement days of the forewarnings. This implies that poor‐performing firms are likely to have negative information and thus, have incentives not to disclose or not to correctly disclose bad news. In addition, our result demonstrates that firms performing poorly before receiving the forewarnings subsequently perform poorly after confirmation of the unfaithful disclosure, which is consistent with the incentives of unfaithful disclosure. Most importantly, we found that individual investors constantly buy shares of firms receiving the forewarnings prior to the announcements, whereas both domestic and foreign institutional investors sell them. Even after the confirmation of unfaithful disclosure, individual investors continue to buy shares of unfaithful firms and domestic and foreign instit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retail investors face fewer formal constraints and are more likely to derive expressive or identity-based utility from investing in environmentally responsible firms if sustainability is important to them.
“Retail investors, by contrast, face fewer formal constraints and are more likely to derive expressive or identity-based utility from investing in environmentally responsible firms if sustainability is important to them.”
From The origins of <scp>ESG</scp> demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings (2026) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2014
Individual investors respond strongly to salient public information, moral narratives, and social norms, and are willing to trade off financial returns to express ethical or value-based preferences.
“Behavioral finance research shows that individual investors respond strongly to salient public information, moral narratives, and social norms, and are willing to trade off financial returns to express ethical or value-based preferences”
From The origins of <scp>ESG</scp> demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings (2026) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2014
Cites
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
You, L., & Payne, J. (2026) · Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1002/rfe.70039
- Authors
- Chung, C. Y., Lee, J., & Park, J.
- Affiliations
- Chung-Ang University (KR)
- Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
- College of Business Administration Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
- ORCID
- Chung, Chune Young
- Venue
- Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-182
- ISSN
- 2041-6156 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-9945
- OpenAlex
- W2033119002
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Keywords
- corporate disclosure, retail investors, institutional investors, foreign institutional investors, information asymmetry, investor trading behavior, market reaction, investor sophistication, Korean stock market
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review