Cited by 19Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Placental expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptors in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia

Abstract

Problem: Recent advances in lipid research have revealed that impairments in lipid mediator signaling can be involved in the pathoetiology of a variety of diseases. We previously reported aberrant expression of autotaxin, a key enzyme for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) production, in placentas from women with preeclampsia. The present study aimed to further explore the involvement of LPA signaling in the pathoetiology of preeclampsia. Method of study: Term placentas were obtained from deliveries after uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 18) and those complicated by preeclampsia (n = 24). First‐trimester placental tissues were collected after elective terminations of pregnancy (n = 20). Placental expression of the six identified LPARs (LPAR1‐6) was analyzed at protein and mRNA levels. Results: In normal pregnancy, the mRNA expression levels of all LPARs except LPAR4 were significantly higher in term. Levels of mRNA encoding LPAR2‐5 were significantly increased in preeclampsia placentas compared with those in the normal term placentas. Using Western immunoblotting, only LPAR3 was noted to be increased at the protein level in placentas from preeclamptic pregnancies. This was validated by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: In summary, the placental expression of LPARs, particularly LPAR3, is enhanced in preeclampsia, suggesting that disturbances in placental LPA signaling may be involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aji.13176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dosing branch predicted individualized GC regimens with sub-milligram precision, outperforming static gestational age-based protocols (12 mg × 2) that neglect inter-individual variation.

    “Third, by integrating serial multimodal features with dynamic metabolomic scores, the dosing branch predicted individualized GC regimens with sub-milligram precision, outperforming static gestational age-based protocols (12 mg × 2) that neglect inter-individual variation (19, 20).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.06.038 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.05.016 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0049-3848(13)70013-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.11.021 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.12.008 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.042 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/aji.12239 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.04.015 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/boc.201300011 · DOI
  10. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302831 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.7906 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nn1157 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/cvr/cvq369 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ng.84 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature03505 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1668 · DOI
  17. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.004051 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.039 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00715.x · DOI
  20. 10.1210/en.2009-0779 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/jog.12742 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/bies.20081 · DOI
  23. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0288 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041096 · DOI
  25. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0143 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M605142200 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/MCB.02419-05 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00418-004-0677-x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.11.014 · DOI
  30. 10.1096/fj.14-262659 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.redox.2018.01.002 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fujii, T., Nagamatsu, T., Schust, D. J., Ichikawa, M., Kumasawa, K., Yabe, S., Iriyama, T., Hirota, Y., Osuga, Y., Aoki, J., Yatomi, Y., & Fujii, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nagamatsu, Takeshi
Venue
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-16
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
e13176-e13176
ISSN
  • 0271-7352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1046-7408
  • 1600-0897
OpenAlex
W2965931650
Cited by
19
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Reproductive Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H02943, 15H04979)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
lysophosphatidic acid, lysophosphatidic acid receptor, LPAR3, preeclampsia, placenta, autotaxin, gene expression, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Placenta, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Receptors, Lysophosphatidic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review