Bereaved parents’ experience of care and follow‐up after stillbirth in Sydney hospitals
Abstract
Background Despite stillbirth being identified as one of the most traumatic events a woman can experience, there is a lack of evidence on which to inform best practice in hospital and follow-up care. Aims The aim of this study was to identify which strategies are most valued by parents regarding care following stillbirth in order to improve the support and management of grieving families. Method Mixed methods questionnaires were sent to bereaved participants of the Sydney Stillbirth Study. Questionnaires included a combination of fixed and open-ended responses regarding two critical areas: the participant's hospital stay and their follow-up care. We analysed the qualitative data using thematic analysis. Results Of the 103 women who experienced a stillbirth, 36 responded to the questionnaire. Responders were more likely to have private obstetric care (odds ratio (OR) 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-12.7) and be tertiary educated (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.3-16.8). Three key themes relating to hospital management of stillbirth were identified: the emotional response to grief, the educational importance of being guided through the grief process, and the environmental aspects of adequate time and appropriate physical space. Families preferred not to be seen in an antenatal setting for follow-up. Conclusions Simple key components of care including a sensitive and respectful approach, offering guidance as to creating memories, and arranging follow-up care in a quiet and private environment are valued by fa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five mixed methods studies have been published since 2014.
“Five mixed methods studies have been published since 2014.97,98,100,101,227”
From Bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately following perinatal loss: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [97]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Bond, D., Raynes‐Greenow, C., & Gordon, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bond, Diana
- Venue
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-04
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-191
- ISSN
- 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-828X
- OpenAlex
- W2743705117
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stillbirth Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- stillbirth, bereaved parents, grief, hospital care, follow-up care, parental experiences, emotional response to loss, memory formation, antenatal follow-up, hospital environment
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, New South Wales, Parents, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stillbirth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review