Cited by 17Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Bereaved parents’ experience of care and follow‐up after stillbirth in Sydney hospitals

Bond, Diana, Raynes‐Greenow, Camille, Gordon, Adrienne·2018·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

Background Despite stillbirth being identified as one of the most traumatic events a woman can experience, there is a lack of evidence on which to inform best practice in hospital and follow-up care. Aims The aim of this study was to identify which strategies are most valued by parents regarding care following stillbirth in order to improve the support and management of grieving families. Method Mixed methods questionnaires were sent to bereaved participants of the Sydney Stillbirth Study. Questionnaires included a combination of fixed and open-ended responses regarding two critical areas: the participant's hospital stay and their follow-up care. We analysed the qualitative data using thematic analysis. Results Of the 103 women who experienced a stillbirth, 36 responded to the questionnaire. Responders were more likely to have private obstetric care (odds ratio (OR) 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-12.7) and be tertiary educated (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.3-16.8). Three key themes relating to hospital management of stillbirth were identified: the emotional response to grief, the educational importance of being guided through the grief process, and the environmental aspects of adequate time and appropriate physical space. Families preferred not to be seen in an antenatal setting for follow-up. Conclusions Simple key components of care including a sensitive and respectful approach, offering guidance as to creating memories, and arranging follow-up care in a quiet and private environment are valued by fa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajo.12684

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 17

Authors
Bond, D., Raynes‐Greenow, C., & Gordon, A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bond, Diana
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-04
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
185-191
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
OpenAlex
W2743705117
Cited by
17
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stillbirth Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, bereaved parents, grief, hospital care, follow-up care, parental experiences, emotional response to loss, memory formation, antenatal follow-up, hospital environment
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, New South Wales, Parents, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review