Policing the Organizational Threat in Morocco: Protest and Public Violence in Liberal Autocracies
Abstract
As a prominent form of state violence against civilians, protest policing represents the type of coercion that “liberal” autocrats seek to minimize. Departing from aggregate notions of “mass threat” that dominate studies of authoritarian response to contention, this article develops an event‐level model of protest policing centering the role of social movement organizations in shaping elite threat perceptions and, hence, the likelihood that protests will face state violence. More than public protest per se, I argue that liberal autocrats fear the rise of autonomous, national‐level organizations capable of providing unregulated channels for citizen claim‐making. Having forsworn the ability to control which networks become active as social movement organizations, liberal autocrats use protest policing to dissuade citizens from mobilizing with autonomous organizations and to protect the near‐monopoly of embedded organizations over contention. I illustrate these arguments with unique protest event data from Morocco. I draw implications for the durability of liberalized regimes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizations facilitate mobilization but are also prime targets for repression, cooptation, and infiltration precisely because they are known loci for action.
“organizations facilitate mobilization (Olson 1965), but are also prime targets for repression (Berman 2021; Davenport 2015; Sullivan 2016), cooptation (Collier and Collier 1979), and infiltration (Mattingly 2020) precisely because they are known loci for action.”
From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Berman 2021
Cites
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353 · Cited by 3,459 · see citing works
Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009 · Cited by 2,132 · see citing works
What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?
Geddes, B. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115 · Cited by 2,025 · see citing works
State Repression and Political Order
Davenport, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
Davenport, C. (1995) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111650 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace
Davenport, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510021 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Repression, Response, and Contained Escalation Under "Liberalized" Authoritarianism in Jordan
Moss, D. (2014) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.19.3.q508v72264766u92 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HASSAN, M. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000291 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…is well established within research on SMOs: organizations facilitate mobilization (Olson 1965), but are also prime targets for repression (Berman 2021; Davenport 2015; Sullivan 2016), coop-tation (Collier and Collier 1979), and infiltration (Mattingly 2020) precisely because they are…”
Background
- Authors
- Berman, C. E.
- Corresponding author
- Berman, Chantal E.
- ORCID
- Berman, Chantal E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 733-754
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W3113170588
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Keywords
- protest policing, social movement organizations, popular protest, public violence, regime durability, citizen mobilization, Morocco
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review