Cited by 31Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical and Social IssuesMiddle East Politics and Society

Policing the Organizational Threat in Morocco: Protest and Public Violence in Liberal Autocracies

Berman, Chantal E.·2021·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

As a prominent form of state violence against civilians, protest policing represents the type of coercion that “liberal” autocrats seek to minimize. Departing from aggregate notions of “mass threat” that dominate studies of authoritarian response to contention, this article develops an event‐level model of protest policing centering the role of social movement organizations in shaping elite threat perceptions and, hence, the likelihood that protests will face state violence. More than public protest per se, I argue that liberal autocrats fear the rise of autonomous, national‐level organizations capable of providing unregulated channels for citizen claim‐making. Having forsworn the ability to control which networks become active as social movement organizations, liberal autocrats use protest policing to dissuade citizens from mobilizing with autonomous organizations and to protect the near‐monopoly of embedded organizations over contention. I illustrate these arguments with unique protest event data from Morocco. I draw implications for the durability of liberalized regimes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajps.12565

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizations facilitate mobilization but are also prime targets for repression, cooptation, and infiltration precisely because they are known loci for action.

    “organizations facilitate mobilization (Olson 1965), but are also prime targets for repression (Berman 2021; Davenport 2015; Sullivan 2016), cooptation (Collier and Collier 1979), and infiltration (Mattingly 2020) precisely because they are known loci for action.”

    From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Berman 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Coordinated Dis-Coordination

    HASSAN, M. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000291 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

    “…is well established within research on SMOs: organizations facilitate mobilization (Olson 1965), but are also prime targets for repression (Berman 2021; Davenport 2015; Sullivan 2016), coop-tation (Collier and Collier 1979), and infiltration (Mattingly 2020) precisely because they are…”
    Background

Authors
Berman, C. E.
Corresponding author
Berman, Chantal E.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-15
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
733-754
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W3113170588
Cited by
31
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
Keywords
protest policing, social movement organizations, popular protest, public violence, regime durability, citizen mobilization, Morocco

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review