Cited by 14Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceInnovations in Medical Education

Training general practitioners in remote W estern A ustralia in a method of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use: A pilot study

Brennan, Catherine, Newton, Melanie, Wood, Fiona, Schug, Stephan A., Allsop, Steve, Browne, Allyson L.·2013·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

Objective: High levels of alcohol‐related harm are a salient feature of many rural communities in A ustralia. General practitioners (GPs) are uniquely placed to identify and treat patients with harmful alcohol use in remote settings, yet corresponding opportunities for education in effective brief psychological interventions for harmful alcohol use are limited. This study piloted a training model for alcohol screening and brief intervention for GPs working in K algoorlie‐B oulder, a remote W estern A ustralian community facing significant alcohol‐related problems. Design: Observational pilot study. Setting: Primary care. Main outcome measure(s): Perceived role in responding to harmful alcohol use, and confidence and knowledge of alcohol screening and brief intervention; satisfaction with a short training session focused on alcohol screening and brief intervention; and impact of training on implementation of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use. Results: Fifty per cent of GPs took up the training opportunity. GPs recognised their professional responsibility for conducting brief intervention but reported comparatively lower confidence and skills in implementing screening and intervention prior to training. The training improved knowledge and confidence in conducting alcohol screening and brief intervention. All GPs increased their frequency of alcohol screening, and 88% of GPs reported increasing the frequency of brief intervention at 6 months. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that among participating GPs, subsequent compliance with identification and management of harmful alcohol use was improved. Further work examining methods to improve rural and remote GP participation in alcohol‐related harm prevention training is required, as the potential impact on communities with disproportionately high alcohol‐related difficulties is significant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajr.12019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 14

Authors
Brennan, C., Newton, M., Wood, F., Schug, S. A., Allsop, S., & Browne, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Browne, Allyson L.
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
72-79
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W1573332585
Cited by
14
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
State Health Research Advisory Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
alcohol screening, brief intervention, hazardous drinking, general practitioners, rural primary care, remote communities, alcohol-related harm, professional training, alcohol prevention
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Humans, Pilot Projects, Rural Population, Western Australia, General Practitioners, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review