Training general practitioners in remote W estern A ustralia in a method of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use: A pilot study
Abstract
Objective: High levels of alcohol‐related harm are a salient feature of many rural communities in A ustralia. General practitioners (GPs) are uniquely placed to identify and treat patients with harmful alcohol use in remote settings, yet corresponding opportunities for education in effective brief psychological interventions for harmful alcohol use are limited. This study piloted a training model for alcohol screening and brief intervention for GPs working in K algoorlie‐B oulder, a remote W estern A ustralian community facing significant alcohol‐related problems. Design: Observational pilot study. Setting: Primary care. Main outcome measure(s): Perceived role in responding to harmful alcohol use, and confidence and knowledge of alcohol screening and brief intervention; satisfaction with a short training session focused on alcohol screening and brief intervention; and impact of training on implementation of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use. Results: Fifty per cent of GPs took up the training opportunity. GPs recognised their professional responsibility for conducting brief intervention but reported comparatively lower confidence and skills in implementing screening and intervention prior to training. The training improved knowledge and confidence in conducting alcohol screening and brief intervention. All GPs increased their frequency of alcohol screening, and 88% of GPs reported increasing the frequency of brief intervention at 6 months. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that among participating GPs, subsequent compliance with identification and management of harmful alcohol use was improved. Further work examining methods to improve rural and remote GP participation in alcohol‐related harm prevention training is required, as the potential impact on communities with disproportionately high alcohol‐related difficulties is significant.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of GPs in 14 studies and of nurses in 2 quantitative studies reported the opposite, that they felt skilled enough to deliver alcohol SBI.
“on the other hand, the majority of the GPs in 14 [16, 20, 23, 36, 52, 62, 64, 70, 78, 83, 95, 106, 108, 111], and of the nurses in 2 quantitative studies [36, 70] reported the opposite.”
Of 23 studies, 16 found that a majority of GPs believed they were confident in their abilities to screen and advise at-risk drinkers.
“Twenty-three studies reported on how GPs felt about their abilities for screening and advising at-risk drinkers, of which 16 found a majority of GPs believed they were confident in their abilities [20, 36, 40, 44–47, 50, 52, 59–62, 64, 65, 67, 78, 81, 83, 104, 106, 108, 111] compared with 1 of 3 studies involving nurses [20, 36, 59].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Brennan, C., Newton, M., Wood, F., Schug, S. A., Allsop, S., & Browne, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Browne, Allyson L.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 72-79
- ISSN
- 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1584
- OpenAlex
- W1573332585
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- State Health Research Advisory Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- alcohol screening, brief intervention, hazardous drinking, general practitioners, rural primary care, remote communities, alcohol-related harm, professional training, alcohol prevention
- MeSH terms
- Alcoholism, Humans, Pilot Projects, Rural Population, Western Australia, General Practitioners, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review