Helping policy‐makers address rural health access problems
Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the key dimensions of access and their significance for the provision of primary health care and a framework that assists policy‐makers to evaluate how well policy targets the dimensions of access. Access to health care can be conceptualised as the potential ease with which consumers can obtain health care at times of need. Disaggregation of the concept of access into the dimensions of availability, geography, affordability, accommodation, timeliness, acceptability and awareness allows policy‐makers to identify key questions which must be addressed to ensure reasonable primary health care access for rural and remote A ustralians. Evaluating how well national primary health care policies target these dimensions of access helps identify policy gaps and potential inequities in ensuring access to primary health care. Effective policies must incorporate the multiple dimensions of access if they are to comprehensively and effectively address unacceptable inequities in health status and access to basic health services experienced by rural and remote A ustralians.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Affordability posed a challenge for individuals who required frequent and complex primary healthcare consultations, lacked health insurance, needed expensive medications or diagnostics, faced high out-of-pocket consultations, and had to travel long distances.
“A review study conducted by D.J. Russel and colleagues in Australia revealed that affordability posed a challenge for individuals who required frequent and complex primary healthcare consultations, lacked health insurance, needed expensive medications or diagnostics, faced high out-of-pocket consultations, and had to travel long distances.”
From Identifying the accessibility barriers for chronic disease management in health care delivery system amongst the Urban Poor of Kolkata, West Bengal, India (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care Utilization in the United States
Andersen, R., & Newman, J. F. (1973) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society · doi:10.2307/3349613 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
A re-conceptualization of access for 21st century healthcare
Fortney, J. C., Burgess, J. F., Bosworth, H. B., Booth, B. M., & Kaboli, P. J. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1806-6 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, P., & Bardhan, M. (2025) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1050_24 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Russell, D. J., Humphreys, J. S., Ward, B., Chisholm, M., Buykx, P., McGrail, M., & Wakerman, J.
- Affiliations
- School of Rural Health Monash University, Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care Bendigo Victoria Australia
- School of Rural Health Monash University, Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care Churchill Victoria Australia
- Centre for Remote Health Flinders University & Charles Darwin University, Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care Alice Springs Northern Territory Australia
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-71
- ISSN
- 1038-5282
- 1440-1584
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review