Diabetes screening in pregnancy failing women in rural Western Australia: An audit of oral glucose tolerance test completion rates
Abstract
Objective: To quantify screening rate for gestational diabetes mellitus and completion of oral glucose tolerance test in rural and remote Western Australia. Design and participants: Retrospective audit of 551 antenatal records from women of 16 years and older without pre‐existing diabetes and with singleton pregnancies delivered in 2013. Main outcome measures: Number of women recorded screened for gestational diabetes mellitus in second or third trimester using oral glucose tolerance test or other tests; gestational diabetes mellitus rate. Results: Only 278 (50.5%) women were screened with oral glucose tolerance test; 113 (20.5%) had no record of any screening related to gestational diabetes mellitus. In a nested mixed‐effects logistic regression model, women with a previous gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis, two or more risk factors (excluding ethnicity) or high‐risk gestational diabetes mellitus ethnicity other than Australian Aboriginal were more likely to be screened, while Australian Aboriginal women were less likely to be screened with oral glucose tolerance test. Clinicians reported patient and clinician factors and logistical difficulties as reasons for the oral glucose tolerance test not being completed at their site. Of those screened with oral glucose tolerance test, a high rate of gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed (14.7% versus Western Australia state‐wide average of 7.4%). Conclusion: Adherence to oral glucose tolerance test screening in rural Western Australia is inadequate for effective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Screening was not acceptable or available for a significant proportion of women at risk. Efforts to improve oral glucose tolerance test adherence and exploration of alternative gestational diabetes mellitus screening strategies are required.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant barriers to POGTT screening have been reported in remote First Nations communities in Australia.
“Significant barriers to POGTT screening have been reported in remote First Nations communities in Australia, 56”
Cites
Metzger, B. E., Gabbe, S. G., Persson, B., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Oats, J. J. N., & Buchanan, T. A. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0719 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sweeting, A., Hare, M. J., de Jersey, S. J., Shub, A. L., Zinga, J., Foged, C., Hall, R. M., Wong, T., & Simmons, D. (2025) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.52696 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kirke, A. B., Atkinson, D., Moore, S., Sterry, K., Singleton, S., Roxburgh, C., Parrish, K., Porter, C., & Marley, J. V.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kirke, Andrew B.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-29
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-69
- ISSN
- 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1584
- OpenAlex
- W2914497267
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetes screening, oral glucose tolerance test, screening completion rates, rural health care, remote areas, risk factors, prenatal care, Western Australia
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Western Australia, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Young Adult, Rural Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review