Cited by 38Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

Diabetes screening in pregnancy failing women in rural Western Australia: An audit of oral glucose tolerance test completion rates

Kirke, Andrew B., Atkinson, David, Moore, Sarah, Sterry, Kylie, Singleton, Sally, Roxburgh, Carly, Parrish, Kate, Porter, Cindy +1 more·2019·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

Objective: To quantify screening rate for gestational diabetes mellitus and completion of oral glucose tolerance test in rural and remote Western Australia. Design and participants: Retrospective audit of 551 antenatal records from women of 16 years and older without pre‐existing diabetes and with singleton pregnancies delivered in 2013. Main outcome measures: Number of women recorded screened for gestational diabetes mellitus in second or third trimester using oral glucose tolerance test or other tests; gestational diabetes mellitus rate. Results: Only 278 (50.5%) women were screened with oral glucose tolerance test; 113 (20.5%) had no record of any screening related to gestational diabetes mellitus. In a nested mixed‐effects logistic regression model, women with a previous gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis, two or more risk factors (excluding ethnicity) or high‐risk gestational diabetes mellitus ethnicity other than Australian Aboriginal were more likely to be screened, while Australian Aboriginal women were less likely to be screened with oral glucose tolerance test. Clinicians reported patient and clinician factors and logistical difficulties as reasons for the oral glucose tolerance test not being completed at their site. Of those screened with oral glucose tolerance test, a high rate of gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed (14.7% versus Western Australia state‐wide average of 7.4%). Conclusion: Adherence to oral glucose tolerance test screening in rural Western Australia is inadequate for effective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Screening was not acceptable or available for a significant proportion of women at risk. Efforts to improve oral glucose tolerance test adherence and exploration of alternative gestational diabetes mellitus screening strategies are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajr.12465

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirke, A. B., Atkinson, D., Moore, S., Sterry, K., Singleton, S., Roxburgh, C., Parrish, K., Porter, C., & Marley, J. V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Corresponding author
Kirke, Andrew B.
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-29
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
64-69
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W2914497267
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetes screening, oral glucose tolerance test, screening completion rates, rural health care, remote areas, risk factors, prenatal care, Western Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Western Australia, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Young Adult, Rural Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review