The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors
Open accessAbstract
Changes in heart transplantation (HT) donor and recipient demographics may influence the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate PGD incidence, trends, and associated risk factors by analyzing consecutive adult patients who underwent HT between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Patients were categorized as having PGD using the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)-defined criteria. Variables, including clinical and demographic characteristics of donors and recipients, were selected to assess their independent association with PGD. A time-trend analysis was performed over the study period. Three-hundred seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Left ventricular PGD, right ventricular PGD, or both, were observed in 99 patients (31%). Risk factors independently associated with PGD included ischemic time, recipient African American race, and recipient amiodarone treatment. Over the study period, there was no change in the PGD incidence; however, there was an increase in the recipient pretransplantation use of amiodarone. The rate of 30-day mortality was significantly elevated in those with PGD versus those without PGD (6.06% vs 0.92%, P = .01). Despite recent advancements, incidence of PGD remains high. Understanding associated risk factors may allow for implementation of targeted therapeutic interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lang, R. M., Bierig, M., Devereux, R. B., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Pellikka, P. A., Picard, M. H., Roman, M. J., Seward, J., Shanewise, J. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005 · Cited by 11,318
How to handle mortality when investigating length of hospital stay and time to clinical stability
Brock, G. N., Barnes, C., Ramirez, J. A., & Myers, J. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-144 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Nicoara, A., Skubas, N., Ad, N., Finley, A., Hahn, R. T., Mahmood, F., Mankad, S., Nyman, C. B., Pagani, F., Porter, T. R., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.002 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicoara, A., Ruffin, D., Cooter, M., Patel, C. B., Thompson, A., Schroder, J. N., Daneshmand, M. A., Hernandez, A. F., Rogers, J. G., Podgoreanu, M. V., Swaminathan, M., Kretzer, A., Stafford-Smith, M., Milano, C. A., & Bartz, R. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1461-1470
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2770116287
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ajt.14588
- The paper
- Nicoara, A., Ruffin, D., Cooter, M., Patel, C. B., Thompson, A., Schroder, J. N., Daneshmand, M. A., Hernandez, A. F., Rogers, J. G., Podgoreanu, M. V., Swaminathan, M., Kretzer, A., Stafford-Smith, M., Milano, C. A., & Bartz, R. R. (2018). Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.