Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors

Open access
Nicoara, Alina, Ruffin, David, Cooter, Mary, Patel, Chetan B., Thompson, Annemarie, Schroder, Jacob N., Daneshmand, Mani A., Hernandez, Adrian F., Rogers, Joseph G., Podgoreanu, Mihai V., Swaminathan, Madhav, Kretzer, Adam, Stafford-Smith, Mark, Milano, Carmelo A., Bartz, Raquel R.·2018·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Changes in heart transplantation (HT) donor and recipient demographics may influence the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate PGD incidence, trends, and associated risk factors by analyzing consecutive adult patients who underwent HT between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Patients were categorized as having PGD using the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)-defined criteria. Variables, including clinical and demographic characteristics of donors and recipients, were selected to assess their independent association with PGD. A time-trend analysis was performed over the study period. Three-hundred seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Left ventricular PGD, right ventricular PGD, or both, were observed in 99 patients (31%). Risk factors independently associated with PGD included ischemic time, recipient African American race, and recipient amiodarone treatment. Over the study period, there was no change in the PGD incidence; however, there was an increase in the recipient pretransplantation use of amiodarone. The rate of 30-day mortality was significantly elevated in those with PGD versus those without PGD (6.06% vs 0.92%, P = .01). Despite recent advancements, incidence of PGD remains high. Understanding associated risk factors may allow for implementation of targeted therapeutic interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajt.14588

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Nicoara, A., Ruffin, D., Cooter, M., Patel, C. B., Thompson, A., Schroder, J. N., Daneshmand, M. A., Hernandez, A. F., Rogers, J. G., Podgoreanu, M. V., Swaminathan, M., Kretzer, A., Stafford-Smith, M., Milano, C. A., & Bartz, R. R.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1461-1470
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770116287
Cited by
165
References
2
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ajt.14588
The paper
Nicoara, A., Ruffin, D., Cooter, M., Patel, C. B., Thompson, A., Schroder, J. N., Daneshmand, M. A., Hernandez, A. F., Rogers, J. G., Podgoreanu, M. V., Swaminathan, M., Kretzer, A., Stafford-Smith, M., Milano, C. A., & Bartz, R. R. (2018). Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Incidence, trends, and associated risk factors. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14588

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.