Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First European data from the network of severe allergic reactions (NORA)

Worm, M., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Scherer, K., Lang, R., Fernandez‐Rivas, M., Cardona, V., Kowalski, M. L., Jutel, M., Poziomkowska‐Gesicka, I., Papadopoulos, N. G., Beyer, K., Mustakov, T., Christoff, G., Bilò, M. B., Muraro, A., Hourihane, J. O. B., Grabenhenrich, L. B.·2014·Allergy

Abstract

Background: Occurrence, elicitors and treatment of severe allergic reactions are recognized and reported differently between countries. We aimed to collect standardized data throughout Europe on anaphylaxis referred for diagnosis and counselling. Methods: Tertiary allergy, dermatology and paediatric units in 10 European countries took part in this pilot phase of the first European Anaphylaxis Registry, from June 2011 to March 2014. An online questionnaire was used to collect data on severe allergic reactions based on the medical history and diagnostics. Results: Fifty‐nine centres reported 3333 cases of anaphylaxis, with 26.7% below 18 years of age. Allergic reactions were mainly caused by food (children and adults 64.9% and 20.2%, respectively) and insect venom (20.2% and 48.2%) and less often by drugs (4.8% and 22.4%). Most reactions occurred within 30 min of exposure (80.5%); a delay of 4+ hours was mainly seen in drug anaphylaxis (6.7%). Symptom patterns differed by elicitor, with the skin being affected most often (84.1%). A previous, usually milder reaction to the same allergen was reported by 34.2%. The mainstay of first‐line treatment by professionals included corticoids (60.4%) and antihistamines (52.8%). Only 13.7% of lay‐ or self‐treated reactions to food and 27.6% of insect anaphylaxis received on‐site adrenaline. Conclusion: This pilot phase of a pan‐European registry for severe allergic reactions provides for the first time data on anaphylaxis throughout Europe, demonstrates its potential functionality and allows a comparison of symptom patterns, elicitors and treatment habits between referral centres and countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/all.12475

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Worm, M., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Scherer, K., Lang, R., Fernandez‐Rivas, M., Cardona, V., Kowalski, M. L., Jutel, M., Poziomkowska‐Gesicka, I., Papadopoulos, N. G., Beyer, K., Mustakov, T., Christoff, G., Bilò, M. B., Muraro, A., Hourihane, J. O. B., & Grabenhenrich, L. B.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-16
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
1397-1404
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2108793950
Cited by
327
References
1
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First European data from the network of severe allergic reactions (NORA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/all.12475
The paper
Worm, M., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Scherer, K., Lang, R., Fernandez‐Rivas, M., Cardona, V., Kowalski, M. L., Jutel, M., Poziomkowska‐Gesicka, I., Papadopoulos, N. G., Beyer, K., Mustakov, T., Christoff, G., Bilò, M. B., Muraro, A., Hourihane, J. O. B., & Grabenhenrich, L. B. (2014). First European data from the network of severe allergic reactions (NORA). Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12475

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.