The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in COVID‐19 patients
Open accessAbstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread globally outside China. We aimed to investigate the role of peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) as a marker in the course of the virus infection to improve the efficiency of diagnosis and evaluation of COVID‐19 patients. Methods: 227 pneumonia patients who visited the fever clinics in Shanghai General Hospital and 97 hospitalized COVID‐19 patients admitted to Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center were involved in a retrospective research study. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data were collected. The trend of EOS level in COVID‐19 patients and comparison among patients with different severity were summarized. Results: The majority of COVID‐19 patients (71.7%) had a decrease in circulating EOS counts, which was significantly more frequent than other types of pneumonia patients. EOS counts had good value for COVID‐19 prediction, even higher when combined with neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio. Patients with low EOS counts at admission were more likely to have fever, fatigue, and shortness of breath, with more lesions in chest CT and radiographic aggravation, and longer length of hospital stay and course of disease than those with normal EOS counts. Circulating EOS level gradually increased over the time, and was synchronous with the improvement in chest CT (12 days vs 13 days, P = .07), later than that of body temperature (12 days vs 10 days, P = .014), but earlier than that of the negative conversion of nucleic acid assays (12 days vs 17 days, P = .001). Conclusion: Peripheral blood EOS counts may be an effective and efficient indicator in diagnosis, Evaluation, and prognosis monitoring of COVID‐19 patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hui, D. S., I Azhar, E., Madani, T. A., Ntoumi, F., Kock, R., Dar, O., Ippolito, G., Mchugh, T. D., Memish, Z. A., Drosten, C., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009 · Cited by 3,809
Yang, Y., Yang, M., Shen, C., Wang, F., Yuan, J., Li, J., Zhang, M., Wang, Z., Xing, L., Wei, J., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493 · Cited by 836 · cited 1×
“All rights reserved patients were confirmed or excluded by nucleic acid assay, while false negative was unavoidable[15].”
Self-citation
Cited by
Predictors of COVID‐19 severity: A literature review
Gallo Marin, B., Aghagoli, G., Lavine, K., Yang, L., Siff, E. J., Chiang, S. S., Salazar‐Mather, T. P., Dumenco, L., Savaria, M. C., Aung, S. N., et al. (2021) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.2146 · Cited by 819
Hypereosinophilia causes progressive cardiac pathologies in mice
Diny, N. L., Wood, M. K., Won, T., Talor, M. V., Lukban, C., Bedja, D., Wang, N., Kalinoski, H., Daoud, A., Talbot, C. C., et al. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107990 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, G., Ding, F., Han, L., Yin, D., Lu, H., & Zhang, M.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-13
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 471-482
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W3036031606
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in COVID‐19 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/all.14465
- The paper
- Xie, G., Ding, F., Han, L., Yin, D., Lu, H., & Zhang, M. (2021). The role of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in COVID‐19 patients. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.