The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beaches—Past and Present
Abstract
Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kosiba, S. (2019) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13261 · Cited by 22
Norman, S. (2021) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13591 · Cited by 8
Struzik, J. (2026) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2026.2639948
Metadata
- Authors
- Battle‐Baptiste, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Battle‐Baptiste, Whitney
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 536-537
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W2888097672
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
- Keywords
- beaches, shoreline change, human-nature relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review