Cited by 3Coastal and Marine DynamicsMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beaches—Past and Present

Battle‐Baptiste, Whitney·2018·American Anthropologist

Abstract

Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aman.13072

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Battle‐Baptiste, W.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Battle‐Baptiste, Whitney
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
536-537
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W2888097672
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Keywords
beaches, shoreline change, human-nature relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review