Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The incidence and importance of anaemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the UK – the first Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists national audit

Klein, A. A., Collier, T. J., Brar, M. S., Evans, C., Hallward, G., Fletcher, S. N., Richards, T., the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA)·2016·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary: The importance and variability of pre‐operative anaemia in cardiac surgical patients across the UK is not known, and there is debate about its association with patient outcomes. The Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists carried out its first national audit on anaemia and transfusion, and analysed data from 19,033 patients operated on in 12 cardiac surgical centres between 2010 and 2012; 5895 (31%) had pre‐operative anaemia. Centre‐specific prevalence of anaemia varied from 23% to 45%; anaemia was associated with older patients, diabetes and surgical risk (EuroSCORE). Nevertheless, controlling for these factors, regional variation remained an independent effect (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent association of anaemia with transfusion (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.75 (2.55–2.95), p < 0.001), mortality (1.42 (1.18–1.71), p < 0.001) and hospital stay (geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.15 (1.13–1.17), p < 0.001). Haemoglobin concentration per se was also independently associated with worse outcomes; a 10 g.l −1 decrease in haemoglobin was associated with a 43% increase (95% confidence interval 40–46%) in the odds of transfusion and a 16% increase (95% confidence interval 10–22%) in the odds of mortality (both p < 0.001). This large UK ‐wide audit has demonstrated marked regional variation in both anaemia and transfusion, with a consistently high incidence of both. The independent association between pre‐operative anaemia and worse outcomes in UK practice has also been confirmed, and robust prospective study of anaemia treatment before cardiac surgery is required; these data will assist in designing such trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.13423

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Klein, A. A., Collier, T. J., Brar, M. S., Evans, C., Hallward, G., Fletcher, S. N., Richards, T., & the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA)
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
627-635
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W2300125491
Cited by
192
References
2
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The incidence and importance of anaemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the UK – the first Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists national audit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anae.13423
The paper
Klein, A. A., Collier, T. J., Brar, M. S., Evans, C., Hallward, G., Fletcher, S. N., Richards, T., & the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (ACTA). (2016). The incidence and importance of anaemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the UK – the first Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists national audit. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13423

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.