Cited by 26Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Association between total globozoospermia and sperm chromatin defects

Eskandari, N., Tavalaee, M., Zohrabi, D., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H.·2018·Andrologia

Abstract

Globozoospermia is a severe sperm morphological anomaly leading to primary infertility and low fertilisation following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This phenotype is observed in less than 0.1% of infertile men and is determined by small, round-headed spermatozoa with absence of an acrosomal cap, acrosome protease and also cytoskeletal proteins. Failure of oocyte activation is considered as the main cause of fertilisation failure in these individuals post-ICSI. Therefore, artificial oocyte activation (AOA) along with ICSI is commonly implemented. However, based on previous report, fertilisation rate remains low despite implementation of ICSI-AOA. Therefore, other mechanisms like sperm chromatin packaging and DNA fragmentation may account for low fertilisation and development post-ICSI-AOA. Therefore, this study aims to assess and compare the degree of sperm protamine deficiency and DNA fragmentation in large population of infertile men with total globozoospermia (30 globozoospermic men presenting with 100% round-headed spermatozoa) with 22 fertile individuals using chromomycin A3 and TUNEL assay respectively. Results clearly show that mean of sperm concentration and percentage of sperm motility were significantly lower, while percentage of sperm abnormal morphology, protamine-deficient and DNA-fragmented spermatozoa were significantly higher in infertile men with globozoospermia compared to fertile men. Therefore, increased sperm DNA damage in globozoospermia is li…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/and.12843

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eskandari, N., Tavalaee, M., Zohrabi, D., & Nasr-Esfahani, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Royan Institute (IR)
  • NourDanesh Institute of Higher Education (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Tavalaee, M.
  • Nasr-Esfahani, M. H.
Venue
Andrologia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-29
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
e12843
ISSN
0303-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2732474695
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Andrologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royan Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm DNA fragmentation, protamine deficiency, male infertility, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, artificial oocyte activation, sperm motility, sperm morphology, antioxidant therapy
MeSH terms
Teratozoospermia, Acrosome, Adult, Antioxidants, Chromatin, Humans, Male, Protamines, Sperm Motility, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review