Psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Parkinson's disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). More specifically, we investigated data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability, and construct validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involves data available from two different projects that included people diagnosed with PD for at least 1 year, yielding two samples (1 and 2). The combined total sample (N=346; 60% men) had a mean (SD) age and PD duration of 71 (8.9) and 9 years (6.3), respectively. Both samples received a self-administered survey by mail, which was administered twice in sample 2. Additional data (e.g., clinical assessments) were available for Sample 1. RESULTS: Total GSE scores were computable for 336 participants (97%). Corrected item-total correlations exceeded 0.4. Principal component analyses identified one component (the eigenvalue of the first component extracted was 6.9), explaining 69% of the total variance. Floor and ceiling effects were <6%. Internal consistency (coefficient alpha) was 0.95. Analyses of test-retest reliability yielded (ICC) values from 0.69 to 0.80. The highest value refers to those (n=47) with identical self-ratings of mobility (in the on condition) at both tests; the standard error of measurement was 3.1 points. Construct validity was further supported by correlations in accordance with a priori expectations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the validity and reliability of GSE scores in people with PD; the GSE can thus serve as a valuable outcome measurement in clinical practice and research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The General Self-Efficacy Scale has proven to be a valuable and reliable outcome measure in patients with Parkinson's disease.
“The GSES has proven to be a valuable and reliable outcome measure in patients with PD [41].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- NUNNALLY JC, BERNSTEIN IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
- Authors
- Nilsson, M. H., Hagell, P., & Iwarsson, S.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Kristianstad University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nilsson, M. H.
- Venue
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-96
- ISSN
- 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082754553
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Lund University (MultiPark)
- Ribbingska Foundation in Lund
- Greta and Johan Kock Foundation, Sweden
- Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities (NHR)
- Swedish Council for Working Life, Public Health and Welfare (Forte)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- General Self-Efficacy Scale, Parkinson's disease, psychometric properties, self-efficacy, construct validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, outcome measurement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review