Cited by 46Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Parkinson's disease

Open access
Nilsson, M. H., Hagell, P., Iwarsson, S.·2015·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). More specifically, we investigated data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability, and construct validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involves data available from two different projects that included people diagnosed with PD for at least 1 year, yielding two samples (1 and 2). The combined total sample (N=346; 60% men) had a mean (SD) age and PD duration of 71 (8.9) and 9 years (6.3), respectively. Both samples received a self-administered survey by mail, which was administered twice in sample 2. Additional data (e.g., clinical assessments) were available for Sample 1. RESULTS: Total GSE scores were computable for 336 participants (97%). Corrected item-total correlations exceeded 0.4. Principal component analyses identified one component (the eigenvalue of the first component extracted was 6.9), explaining 69% of the total variance. Floor and ceiling effects were <6%. Internal consistency (coefficient alpha) was 0.95. Analyses of test-retest reliability yielded (ICC) values from 0.69 to 0.80. The highest value refers to those (n=47) with identical self-ratings of mobility (in the on condition) at both tests; the standard error of measurement was 3.1 points. Construct validity was further supported by correlations in accordance with a priori expectations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the validity and reliability of GSE scores in people with PD; the GSE can thus serve as a valuable outcome measurement in clinical practice and research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ane.12368

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 46

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NUNNALLY JC, BERNSTEIN IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

Authors
Nilsson, M. H., Hagell, P., & Iwarsson, S.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Kristianstad University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nilsson, M. H.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
2015-01-28
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082754553
Cited by
46
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lund University (MultiPark)
  • Ribbingska Foundation in Lund
  • Greta and Johan Kock Foundation, Sweden
  • Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities (NHR)
  • Swedish Council for Working Life, Public Health and Welfare (Forte)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
General Self-Efficacy Scale, Parkinson's disease, psychometric properties, self-efficacy, construct validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review