CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureEnvironmental Movements and Political Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Abolition Ecologies and Making “Freedom as a Place”

Heynen, Nik, Ybarra, Megan·2021·Antipode
DOI 10.1111/anti.12666
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This introduction calls for political ecology to systematically engage with the ways that white supremacy shapes human relationships with land through entangled processes of settler colonialism, empire and racial capitalism. To develop the analytic of abolition ecology, we begin with the articulation of W.E.B. Du Bois’ abolition democracy together with Ruth Wilson Gilmore’s spatially attuned analytic of abolition geography. Rather than define communities by the violence they suffer, abolition ecologies call for attention to radical place-making and the land, air and water based environments within which places are made. To that end, we suggest that an abolition ecology demands attention to the ways that coalitional land-based politics dismantle oppressive institutions and to the promise of abolition, which Gilmore describes as making “freedom as a place”.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anti.12666

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. brown a m, 2017, Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds
  2. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816690893.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Delany M R, 1970, Introd, 1859
  4. Douglass F, 2015, The Heroic Slave
  5. Du Bois W E B, 2013, Black Reconstruction in America: Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860–1880
  6. Ellison R, 1995, Going to the Territory
  7. Gilmore R W, 2017, Futures of Black Radicalism, 225
  8. Petitjean C, 2018, Prisons and class warfare: An interview with Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Verso Books Blog

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–216 of 216

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heynen, N., & Ybarra, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Ybarra, Megan
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
21-35
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
DOI
10.1111/anti.12666
OpenAlex
W3081432989
Cited by
204
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3
FWCI
29.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Antipode (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
Keywords
political ecology, white supremacy, settler colonialism, racial capitalism, empire, abolition democracy, W. E. B. Du Bois, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, place-making, political alliances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review