CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 195Political Economy and MarxismGlobalization and political ideologiesWorld Systems and Global Transformations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

State Capitalism and the New Global D/development Regime

Open access
Alami, Ilias, Dixon, Adam D., Mawdsley, Emma·2021·Antipode
DOI 10.1111/anti.12725PMC PMC8453705
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Official discourses of Development are being redefined. If the key geopolitical contexts shaping the post-war Development project were decolonisation and the Cold War, the defining world-historical transformations shaping the emerging vision of Development are the expansion of state capitalism and the rise of China. The IMF, the World Bank, the OECD, the G20, other multilaterals, and bilateral partners are increasingly taking stock of the rise of state capitalism, and acting as ideational vectors of this emerging regime. However, this new "state capitalist normal" is also portrayed as carrying risks. There is anxiety regarding the direction the political form of global capital accumulation is heading: with the unchecked proliferation of state capitalism possibly blunting competition, politicising economic relations, and intensifying geoeconomic tensions. This anxiety underwrites the current re-articulation of Development, one which embraces the state as promoter, supervisor, and owner of capital; even as it critiques China's use of similar instruments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anti.12725

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The rise of state capitalism in development geographies (source: authors)
Figure 1 The rise of state capitalism in development geographies (source: authors)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1521/siso.2021.85.2.162 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1024529419881949 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102237 · DOI
  4. Alami I, Uneven and combined (state) capitalism, Environment and Planning A
  5. 10.1080/14650045.2021.1924943 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/23792949.2020.1799717 · DOI
  7. Arboleda M, 2020, Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction Under Late Capitalism
  8. 10.1080/09692290.2019.1665084 · DOI
  9. BremmerI(2010)The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? New York: Portfolio · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00725.x · DOI
  11. 10.1080/00472336.2014.907927 · DOI
  12. 10.1163/156920608X276305 · DOI
  13. 10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7 · DOI
  14. CherifRandHasanovF(2019) “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy”. IMF Working Paper WP/19/74https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/03/26/The‐Return‐of‐the‐Policy‐That‐Shall‐Not‐Be‐Named‐Principles‐of‐Industrial‐Policy‐46710(last accessed 3 November 2020) · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-3-319-51715-5_1 · DOI
  17. 10.4337/9781784719005.00019 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00447.x · DOI
  19. Essex J, 2013, Development, Security, and Aid: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics at the US Agency for International Development, 10.1353/book21734 · DOI
  20. Gabor D, 2020, The Wall Street Consensus, SocArXiv
  21. Griffith‐Jones S, 2018, The Future of National Development Banks
  22. 10.1080/09692290.2018.1459781 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00130095.2016.1267561 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00719.x · DOI
  25. 10.1093/ia/iix241 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0308518X18763370 · DOI
  27. KimK(2020) “State‐Owned Entities as Development Policy Tools: Political Economy of State Activism in Indonesia.” Unpublished PhD thesis King’s College London
  28. 10.1111/dech.12464 · DOI
  29. Kurlantzick J, 2016, State Capitalism: How the Return of Statism is Transforming the World
  30. 10.1111/gec3.12406 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/2043820618780789 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0309132516678747 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/dpr.12282 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1024529418758479 · DOI
  35. 10.4159/harvard.9780674419582 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/01436597.2018.1455143 · DOI
  37. 10.4324/9780429261145 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/9781119558071.ch9 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/14650040903500999 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.09.009 · DOI
  42. Slater D, 2008, Geopolitics and the Post‐Colonial: Rethinking North‐South Relations
  43. 10.1177/0952695118815553 · DOI
  44. Thurbon E, 2019, Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s drive for intelligent robotics, Review of International Political Economy
  45. UNCTAD(2015) “Trade and Development Report 2015”. United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmenthttps://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tdr2015_en.pdf(last accessed 3 November 2020)
  46. UNCTAD(2016) “Trade and Development Report 2016”. United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmenthttps://unctad.org/system/files/official‐document/tdr2016_en.pdf(last accessed 3 November 2020)
  47. UNCTAD(2018) “World Investment Report 2018”. United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmenthttps://unctad.org/system/files/official‐document/wir2018_en.pdf(last accessed 3 November 2020)
  48. UNCTAD(2020) “World Investment Report 2020”. United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmenthttps://unctad.org/system/files/official‐document/wir2020_en.pdf(last accessed 3 November 2020)
  49. 10.1080/14747731.2012.699915 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/0309132520911996 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/dech.12132 · DOI
  52. World Bank(2013) “Global Financial Development Report 2013: Rethinking the Role of the State in Finance”.https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978‐0‐8213‐9503‐5(last accessed 3 November 2020) · DOI
  53. 10.7591/cornell/9781501702556.003.0003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Alami, I., Dixon, A. D., & Mawdsley, E.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Alami, Ilias
ORCID
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-07
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
1294-1318
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
DOI
10.1111/anti.12725
PMC
PMC8453705
OpenAlex
W3143500542
Cited by
195
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13
FWCI
38.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Antipode (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (758430)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
Keywords
state capitalism, development regimes, international development, China's rise, global capital accumulation, multilateral development agencies, decolonization, Cold War, geopolitics of development, political economy of development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State Capitalism and the New Global D/development Regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anti.12725
The paper
Alami, I., Dixon, A. D., & Mawdsley, E. (2021). State Capitalism and the New Global D/development Regime. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12725