Cited by 21Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

New guidelines for screening, diagnosing, and treating gestational diabetes—Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes in Finland from 2006 to 2012

Ellenberg, Anni, Sarvilinna, Nanna, Gissler, Mika, Ulander, Veli‐Matti·2017·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we have assessed the changes in pregnancy outcomes following the implementation of national guidelines for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). These national guidelines changed the screening policy from risk-based to comprehensive screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective register-based cohort study based on the data from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and Hospital Discharge Register including 34 794 singleton births in 2006-2008 and 36 488 in 2010-2012. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: ) (from 30.0 to 34.7%; p < 0.001). The proportion of insulin-treated women remained unchanged (12.5/12.3%; p = 0.70). The main pregnancy outcomes for the women with GDM were the increased usage of oxytocin (19.5/40.0%, p < 0.001), increased number of inductions (27.2/33.0%; p < 0.001) and reduced birthweight (mean ± SD: 3647 ± 575 g/3567 ± 575 g). Healthy and unscreened women displayed similar results. Children of both women with GDM and healthy screened women had fewer admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (16.3%/12.1%; p < 0.001) and less asphyxia (11.3%/6.3%; p < 0.001). However, the rates of cesarean delivery (26.5%/25.4%, p = 0.31), resuscitation (2.6%/2.0%; p = 0.12), and perinatal mortality (1.2‰/3.1‰, p = 0.11) among women with GDM did not change, whereas the number of hypoglycemia cases increased (2.3%/5.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, glucose tolerance tests were performed twice as often as a result of the implementation of the national GDM guidelines, but this comprehensive screening practice did not improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.13074

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Finland, Ellenberg et al. found an increase in GDM incidence from 7.2% to 11.2% between 2006-2008 and 2010-2012.

    “Ellenberg et al., analyzing data from the Hospital Discharge Register and the Finnish Medical Birth Register in the years 2006–2008 and 2010–2012 found an increase in GDM incidence from 7.2% to 11.2% [185].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellenberg, A., Sarvilinna, N., Gissler, M., & Ulander, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Ellenberg, Anni
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-18
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
372-381
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2560710228
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes screening, risk-based screening, national clinical guidelines, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, perinatal mortality, neonatal intensive care admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, cesarean section, labor induction, birth weight, Finland
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Finland, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review