New guidelines for screening, diagnosing, and treating gestational diabetes—Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes in Finland from 2006 to 2012
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we have assessed the changes in pregnancy outcomes following the implementation of national guidelines for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). These national guidelines changed the screening policy from risk-based to comprehensive screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective register-based cohort study based on the data from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and Hospital Discharge Register including 34 794 singleton births in 2006-2008 and 36 488 in 2010-2012. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: ) (from 30.0 to 34.7%; p < 0.001). The proportion of insulin-treated women remained unchanged (12.5/12.3%; p = 0.70). The main pregnancy outcomes for the women with GDM were the increased usage of oxytocin (19.5/40.0%, p < 0.001), increased number of inductions (27.2/33.0%; p < 0.001) and reduced birthweight (mean ± SD: 3647 ± 575 g/3567 ± 575 g). Healthy and unscreened women displayed similar results. Children of both women with GDM and healthy screened women had fewer admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (16.3%/12.1%; p < 0.001) and less asphyxia (11.3%/6.3%; p < 0.001). However, the rates of cesarean delivery (26.5%/25.4%, p = 0.31), resuscitation (2.6%/2.0%; p = 0.12), and perinatal mortality (1.2‰/3.1‰, p = 0.11) among women with GDM did not change, whereas the number of hypoglycemia cases increased (2.3%/5.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, glucose tolerance tests were performed twice as often as a result of the implementation of the national GDM guidelines, but this comprehensive screening practice did not improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Finland, Ellenberg et al. found an increase in GDM incidence from 7.2% to 11.2% between 2006-2008 and 2010-2012.
“Ellenberg et al., analyzing data from the Hospital Discharge Register and the Finnish Medical Birth Register in the years 2006–2008 and 2010–2012 found an increase in GDM incidence from 7.2% to 11.2% [185].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [185]
Cites
Baz, B., Riveline, J.-P., & Gautier, J.-F. (2016) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-15-0378 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Simmons, D., Jelsma, J. G. M., Galjaard, S., Devlieger, R., van Assche, A., Jans, G., Corcoy, R., Adelantado, J. M., Dunne, F., Desoye, G., et al. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0360 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellenberg, A., Sarvilinna, N., Gissler, M., & Ulander, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Ellenberg, Anni
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-18
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 372-381
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2560710228
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes screening, risk-based screening, national clinical guidelines, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, perinatal mortality, neonatal intensive care admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, cesarean section, labor induction, birth weight, Finland
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Finland, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review