The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort study of nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study investigates associations between maternal body mass index (BMI) early in pregnancy and obstetric interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cohort study of nulliparous women originally included in a cluster randomized controlled trial carried out at 14 Norwegian obstetric units between 2014 and 2017. The sample included 7189 nulliparous women with a singleton fetus, cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor at term, denoted as group 1 in the Ten-Group Classification System. The women were grouped according to the World Health Organization BMI classifications: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), pre-obesity (BMI 25.0-29.9), obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9), and obesity classes II and III (BMI ≥35.0). We used binary logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of the interventions and outcomes, with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing women in different BMI groups with women of normal weight. RESULTS: We found an increased risk of intrapartum cesarean section in women of obesity class I and obesity classes II and III, with adjusted OR of 1.70 (95% CI 1.21-2.38) and 2.31 (95% CI 1.41-3.77), respectively. Women in obesity groups had a gradient of risk of epidural analgesia and use of continuous CTG (including STAN), with adjusted OR of 2.39 (95% CI 1.69-3.38) and 3.28 (95% CI 1.97-5.48), respectively. Women in obesity classes II and III had higher risk of amniotomy (adjusted OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96), oxytocin augmentation (adjusted OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.11-2.15), obstetric anal sphincter injuries (adjusted OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.85) and postpartum hemorrhage ≥1000 mL (adjusted OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.29-3.78). We found a reduced likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery for pre-obese women (adjusted OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97) and no associations between maternal BMI and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Obese women in Ten-Group Classification System group 1 had increased risks of obstetric interventions and maternal complications. There was a gradient of risk for intrapartum cesarean section, with the highest risk for women in obesity classes II and III. No associations between maternal BMI and neonatal outcomes were observed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Risk of post-partum haemorrhage was found to be more than doubled in obese women.
“Similarly, risk of post‐partum haemorrhage was found to be more than doubled in obese women in a study by Dalbye et al. 86”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Obesity is one of the key risk factors for post-partum haemorrhage.
“Obesity is one of the key risk factors for post‐partum haemorrhage.”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Intervention in labour is overall more likely in obese women, who are less likely than women of ideal weight to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery.
“Intervention in labour is overall more likely in obese women, who are less likely than women of ideal weight to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery. 86”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies
Bhattacharya, S., Campbell, D. M., Liston, W. A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2007) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-168 · Cited by 688
Committee Opinion No. 549: Obesity in Pregnancy
(2013) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000425667.10377.60 · Cited by 372
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.355 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003983 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2012.39 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107291.46159.00 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199801153380310 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00437.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01272.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.058 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00991.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.026 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566 · DOI
- 10.1111/aogs.12115 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31991-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/aogs.13629 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102578 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ijgo.12929 · DOI
- 10.1111/1471-0528.14841 · DOI
- Alfirevic Z, 2017, Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour, Cochrane Database System Rev, 2, CD006066
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000188387.88032.41 · DOI
- Bohren MA, 2017, Continuous support for women during childbirth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD003766
- 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00578-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494 · DOI
- 10.1038/ijo.2009.250 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Langley‐Evans, S. C., Pearce, J., & Ellis, S. (2022) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12999 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Dalbye, R., Gunnes, N., Blix, E., Zhang, J., Eggebø, T., Nistov Tokheim, L., Øian, P., & Bernitz, S.
- Affiliations
- Østfold Hospital Trust (NO)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway
- University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Dalbye, Rebecka
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-27
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 521-530
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W3091959475
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- maternal body mass index, maternal obesity, nulliparous women, spontaneous labor, term pregnancy, cesarean section, obstetric surgery, epidural analgesia, continuous fetal heart rate monitoring, amniotomy, oxytocin augmentation, obstetric anal sphincter injury, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal outcomes, neonatal intensive care admission, neonatal sepsis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Norway, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review