The risk of complications in second pregnancy by maternal BMI: The role of first‐pregnancy complications, pregestational diabetes and chronic hypertension
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Maternal obesity is associated with an increased risk of several pregnancy complications. In the second pregnancy, previous pregnancy and other medical history provide additional information about individual morbidity risk. In this study, we assess the risk of pregnancy complications in the second pregnancy by maternal body mass index (BMI) and evaluate how first‐pregnancy complications and preexisting conditions modify these associations. Material and methods: We have used nationwide data on all women (n = 48 963) experiencing their first and second pregnancy between 2006 and 2013 in Finland. The associations between the full scale of maternal BMI and pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia) were analyzed using logistic regression and restricted cubic spline regression models and interactions between BMI and first‐pregnancy complications, pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension were tested. Results: The risk of pregnancy complications increased with adiposity. Unadjusted probability of second‐pregnancy gestational diabetes with BMI of 25 kg/m 2 was 56% and 8.4% among women with and without first‐pregnancy gestational diabetes, respectively. The corresponding figures with BMI of 30 kg/m 2 were 64% and 17%. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for second‐pregnancy gestational diabetes with BMI of 25 kg/m 2 was 45 (34‐59) and 3.3 (2.6‐4.0) among women with and without first‐pregnancy gestational diabetes, respectively, when compared with women with BMI of 20 kg/m 2 and no first‐pregnancy gestational diabetes. Adjusted OR (95% CI) for second‐pregnancy gestational hypertension among women with BMI of 25 kg/m 2 was 42 (26‐66) and 2.3 (1.4‐3.8) among women with and without first‐pregnancy hypertensive disorder, respectively, when compared with women with BMI of 20 kg/m 2 and no first‐pregnancy hypertensive disorder. The risk of preeclampsia increased with adiposity independent of first‐pregnancy complications. Pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension did not modify the association between adiposity and any of the second‐pregnancy complications. Conclusions: As maternal BMI increases, the risk of complications increases in the second pregnancy. The risk of gestational diabetes and hypertension is, however, highest among women with complications in the first pregnancy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to women with BMI 20 kg/m2, the risk of gestational hypertension was 2.3-fold higher (95% CI 1.4-3.8) in women with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2.
“Sormunen‐Harju et al. 60 estimated that, compared to women with BMI 20 kg m–2, the risk of GHT was 2.3‐fold higher (95% CI 1.4–3.8) in women with BMI > 25 kg/m2.”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
The risk of gestational hypertension rose markedly (42-fold) in women who had previously had a pregnancy complicated by gestational hypertension.
“This risk rose markedly (42‐fold) in women who had previously had a pregnancy complicated by GHT.”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Recurrence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Kim, C., Berger, D. K., & Chamany, S. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-2517 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Schummers, L., Hutcheon, J. A., Bodnar, L. M., Lieberman, E., & Himes, K. P. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000591 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Langley‐Evans, S. C., Pearce, J., & Ellis, S. (2022) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12999 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sormunen‐Harju, H., Koivusalo, S., Gissler, M., & Metsälä, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Sormunen‐Harju, Heidi
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-02
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 489-496
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W3093180861
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- maternal obesity, body mass index, second pregnancy, pregnancy complications, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, pregestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, adiposity, risk factor control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Finland, Humans, Obesity, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Gravidity, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review