Universal gestational diabetes screening and antepartum stillbirth rates in Austria-A population-based study
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Occult or untreated gestational diabetes (GDM) is a well‐known risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes and may contribute to antepartum stillbirth. We assessed the impact of screening for GDM on the rate of antepartum stillbirths in non‐anomalous pregnancies by conducting a population‐based study in 974 889 women in Austria. Material and Methods: Our database was derived from the Austrian Birth Registry. Inclusion criteria were singleton live births and antepartum stillbirths ≥24+0 gestational weeks, excluding fetal congenital malformations, terminations of pregnancy and women with pre‐existing type 1 or 2 diabetes. Main outcome measures were (a) overall stillbirth rates and (b) stillbirth rates in women at high risk of GDM (i.e., women with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2, history of previous intrauterine fetal death, GDM, previous macrosomic offspring) before (2008–2010, “phase I”) and after (2011–2019, “phase II”) the national implementation of universal GDM screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in Austrian pregnant women by 2011. Results: In total, 940 373 pregnancies were included between 2008 and 2019, of which 2579 resulted in intrauterine fetal deaths at 33.51 ± 5.10 gestational weeks. After implementation of the GDM screening, a statistically significant reduction in antepartum stillbirth rates among non‐anomalous singletons was observed only in women at high risk for GDM (4.10‰ [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.09–5.43] in phase I vs. 2.96‰ [95% CI 2.57–3.41] in phase II; p = 0.043) but not in the general population (2.76‰ [95% CI 2.55–2.99] in phase I vs. 2.74‰ [95% CI 2.62–2.86] in phase II; p = 0.845). The number needed to screen with the oral glucose tolerance test to subsequently prevent one case of (non‐anomalous) intrauterine fetal death was 880 in the high‐risk and 40 000 in the general population. Conclusions: The implementation of a universal GDM screening program in Austria in 2011 has not led to any significant reduction in antenatal stillbirths among non‐anomalous singletons in the general population. More international data are needed to strengthen our findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Austria, Muin et al. estimated GDM prevalence at 2.9% in 2008-2010 and 4.38% in 2011-2019.
“In 2008–2010, the estimated GDM prevalence was 2.9%; in 2011–2019 it was 4.38% [137].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002501 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030
Lawn, J. E., Blencowe, H., Waiswa, P., Amouzou, A., Mathers, C., Hogan, D., Flenady, V., Frøen, J. F., Qureshi, Z. U., Calderwood, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00837-5 · Cited by 1,778 · see citing works
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flenady, V., Koopmans, L., Middleton, P., Frøen, J. F., Smith, G. C., Gibbons, K., Coory, M., Gordon, A., Ellwood, D., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Kramer, C. K., Campbell, S., & Retnakaran, R. (2019) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4840-2 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
on behalf of the HAPO Follow-up Study Cooperative Research Group, Lowe, W. L., Lowe, L. P., Kuang, A., Catalano, P. M., Nodzenski, M., Talbot, O., Tam, W.-H., Sacks, D. A., McCance, D., et al. (2019) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4809-6 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1]Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016; 16: 7. 26742932 PMC6675405
- [2]Saravanan P. Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020; 8: 793‐ 800. 32822601
- [3]Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1991‐ 2002. 18463375
- [5]Daly B, Toulis KA, Thomas N, et al. Increased risk of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus, a target group in general practice for preventive interventions: a population‐based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2018; 15: e1002488. 29337985 PMC5770032
- [7]Yang J, Zhang C, Chavarro JE, et al. Lifestyle changes and long‐term weight gain in women with and without a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study of 54,062 women in the Nurses' health study II. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45: 348‐ 356. 34880065 PMC8914421
- [8]Sun J, Kim GR, Lee SJ, Kim HC. Gestational diabetes mellitus and the role of intercurrent type 2 diabetes on long‐term risk of cardiovascular events. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 21140. 34707209 PMC8551203
- [9]2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of medical Care in Diabetes‐2020. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43: S14‐ S31. 31862745
- [12]Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high‐income countries. Lancet. 2016; 387: 691‐ 702. 26794070
- [13]Lamont K, Scott NW, Jones GT, Bhattacharya S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350: h3080. 26109551
- [14]Herring AH, Reddy U. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in the second pregnancy. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1173‐ 1174. 20722642
- [15]Bhattacharya S, Prescott GJ, Black M, Shetty A. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in a second pregnancy. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1243‐ 1247. 20573152
- [16]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth Green–top Guideline No. 55. 2010. 39467688
- [17]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin Clinical Management Guidelines No. 102. 2009.
- [20]Aldahmash WM, Alwasel SH, Aljerian K. Gestational diabetes mellitus induces placental vasculopathies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17267-y. Epub ahead of print. 34725760 · DOI
- [21]Franzago M, Fraticelli F, Stuppia L, Vitacolonna E. Nutrigenetics, epigenetics and gestational diabetes: consequences in mother and child. Epigenetics. 2019; 14: 215‐ 235. 30865571 PMC6557546
- [22]Carrasco‐Wong I, Moller A, Giachini FR, et al. Placental structure in gestational diabetes mellitus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Bas Dis. 2020; 1866: 165535. 31442531
- [23]Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U, et al. Work‐up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 433‐ 444. 17466694 PMC2699761
- [24]Bachner F, Bobek J, Habimana K. Austria—Health System review 2018. Vol. 20 No. 3 2018. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/382167/hit‐austria‐eng.pdf?ua=1 30277215
- [27]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. London: © Nice 2019.; 2015 Aug. 32212588
- [28]Koivunen S, Torkki A, Bloigu A, et al. Towards national comprehensive gestational diabetes screening—consequences for neonatal outcome and care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96: 106‐ 113. 27682191
- [29]Stacey T, Tennant P, McCowan L, et al. Gestational diabetes and the risk of late stillbirth: a case‐control study from England, UK. BJOG. 2019; 126: 973‐ 982. 30891907
- [30]Patel EM, Goodnight WH, James AH, Grotegut CA. Temporal trends in maternal medical conditions and stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212(673): e1‐ e11. 25530599
- [31]Man J, Hutchinson JC, Ashworth M, Heazell AE, Jeffrey I, Sebire NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: contemporary demographic features of >1000 cases from an urban population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 591‐ 595. 27781322
- [32]Koivunen S, Kajantie E, Torkki A, et al. The changing face of gestational diabetes: the effect of the shift from risk factor‐based to comprehensive screening. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015; 173: 623‐ 632. 26282598
- [33]O’Sullivan EP, Avalos G, O’Reilly M, Dennedy MC, Gaffney G, Dunne F. Atlantic diabetes in pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 1670‐ 1675. 21494772
- [34]Townsend R, Sileo FG, Allotey J, et al. Prediction of stillbirth: an umbrella review of evaluation of prognostic variables. BJOG. 2021; 128: 238‐ 250. 32931648
- [35]Lau YZ, Widdows K, Roberts SA, et al. Assessment of the quality, content and perceived utility of local maternity guidelines in hospitals in England implementing the saving babies' lives care bundle to reduce stillbirth. BMJ Open Qual. 2020; 9: e000756. PMC7254132 32327423
- [37]Nijkamp JW, Sebire NJ, Bouman K, Korteweg FJ, Erwich J, Gordijn SJ. Perinatal death investigations: what is current practice? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22: 167‐ 175. 28325580 PMC7118457
- [38]Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJ, Timmer A, et al. Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 53.e1‐ 53.e12. 22196684
- [39]Korteweg FJ, Gordijn SJ, Timmer A, et al. The tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter‐rater agreement. BJOG. 2006; 113: 393‐ 401. 16553651
- [40]Page JM, Christiansen‐Lindquist L, Thorsten V, et al. Diagnostic tests for evaluation of stillbirth: results from the stillbirth collaborative research network. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 699‐ 706. 28333795 PMC12935483
- [41]Liu ZN, Jiang Y, Liu XQ, et al. MiRNAs in gestational diabetes mellitus: potential mechanisms and clinical applications. J Diabetes Res. 2021; 2021: 4632745. 34869778 PMC8635917
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Muin, D. A., Pfeifer, B., Helmer, H., Oberaigner, W., Leitner, H., Kiss, H., & Neururer, S.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- Tirol Kliniken (AT)
- UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Muin, Dana A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-23
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 396-404
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- PMC
- PMC9976563
- OpenAlex
- W4213302008
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, universal screening, antepartum stillbirth, intrauterine fetal death, oral glucose tolerance test, screening program implementation, high-risk pregnancy, body mass index, perinatal outcomes, number needed to screen, cost-effectiveness, maternal health policy, Austria, population-based study, 75 g OGTT
- MeSH terms
- Austria, Female, Fetal Death, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Stillbirth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review