Cited by 7Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Universal gestational diabetes screening and antepartum stillbirth rates in Austria-A population-based study

Open access
Muin, Dana A., Pfeifer, Bernhard, Helmer, Hanns, Oberaigner, Wilhelm, Leitner, Hermann, Kiss, Herbert, Neururer, Sabrina·2022·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Introduction: Occult or untreated gestational diabetes (GDM) is a well‐known risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes and may contribute to antepartum stillbirth. We assessed the impact of screening for GDM on the rate of antepartum stillbirths in non‐anomalous pregnancies by conducting a population‐based study in 974 889 women in Austria. Material and Methods: Our database was derived from the Austrian Birth Registry. Inclusion criteria were singleton live births and antepartum stillbirths ≥24+0 gestational weeks, excluding fetal congenital malformations, terminations of pregnancy and women with pre‐existing type 1 or 2 diabetes. Main outcome measures were (a) overall stillbirth rates and (b) stillbirth rates in women at high risk of GDM (i.e., women with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2, history of previous intrauterine fetal death, GDM, previous macrosomic offspring) before (2008–2010, “phase I”) and after (2011–2019, “phase II”) the national implementation of universal GDM screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in Austrian pregnant women by 2011. Results: In total, 940 373 pregnancies were included between 2008 and 2019, of which 2579 resulted in intrauterine fetal deaths at 33.51 ± 5.10 gestational weeks. After implementation of the GDM screening, a statistically significant reduction in antepartum stillbirth rates among non‐anomalous singletons was observed only in women at high risk for GDM (4.10‰ [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.09–5.43] in phase I vs. 2.96‰ [95% CI 2.57–3.41] in phase II; p = 0.043) but not in the general population (2.76‰ [95% CI 2.55–2.99] in phase I vs. 2.74‰ [95% CI 2.62–2.86] in phase II; p = 0.845). The number needed to screen with the oral glucose tolerance test to subsequently prevent one case of (non‐anomalous) intrauterine fetal death was 880 in the high‐risk and 40 000 in the general population. Conclusions: The implementation of a universal GDM screening program in Austria in 2011 has not led to any significant reduction in antenatal stillbirths among non‐anomalous singletons in the general population. More international data are needed to strengthen our findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.14334

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016; 16: 7. 26742932 PMC6675405
  2. [2]Saravanan P. Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020; 8: 793‐ 800. 32822601
  3. [3]Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1991‐ 2002. 18463375
  4. [5]Daly B, Toulis KA, Thomas N, et al. Increased risk of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus, a target group in general practice for preventive interventions: a population‐based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2018; 15: e1002488. 29337985 PMC5770032
  5. [7]Yang J, Zhang C, Chavarro JE, et al. Lifestyle changes and long‐term weight gain in women with and without a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study of 54,062 women in the Nurses' health study II. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45: 348‐ 356. 34880065 PMC8914421
  6. [8]Sun J, Kim GR, Lee SJ, Kim HC. Gestational diabetes mellitus and the role of intercurrent type 2 diabetes on long‐term risk of cardiovascular events. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 21140. 34707209 PMC8551203
  7. [9]2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of medical Care in Diabetes‐2020. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43: S14‐ S31. 31862745
  8. [12]Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high‐income countries. Lancet. 2016; 387: 691‐ 702. 26794070
  9. [13]Lamont K, Scott NW, Jones GT, Bhattacharya S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350: h3080. 26109551
  10. [14]Herring AH, Reddy U. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in the second pregnancy. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1173‐ 1174. 20722642
  11. [15]Bhattacharya S, Prescott GJ, Black M, Shetty A. Recurrence risk of stillbirth in a second pregnancy. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1243‐ 1247. 20573152
  12. [16]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth Green–top Guideline No. 55. 2010. 39467688
  13. [17]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin Clinical Management Guidelines No. 102. 2009.
  14. [20]Aldahmash WM, Alwasel SH, Aljerian K. Gestational diabetes mellitus induces placental vasculopathies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17267-y. Epub ahead of print. 34725760 · DOI
  15. [21]Franzago M, Fraticelli F, Stuppia L, Vitacolonna E. Nutrigenetics, epigenetics and gestational diabetes: consequences in mother and child. Epigenetics. 2019; 14: 215‐ 235. 30865571 PMC6557546
  16. [22]Carrasco‐Wong I, Moller A, Giachini FR, et al. Placental structure in gestational diabetes mellitus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Bas Dis. 2020; 1866: 165535. 31442531
  17. [23]Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U, et al. Work‐up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 433‐ 444. 17466694 PMC2699761
  18. [24]Bachner F, Bobek J, Habimana K. Austria—Health System review 2018. Vol. 20 No. 3 2018. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/382167/hit‐austria‐eng.pdf?ua=1 30277215
  19. [27]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. London: © Nice 2019.; 2015 Aug. 32212588
  20. [28]Koivunen S, Torkki A, Bloigu A, et al. Towards national comprehensive gestational diabetes screening—consequences for neonatal outcome and care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96: 106‐ 113. 27682191
  21. [29]Stacey T, Tennant P, McCowan L, et al. Gestational diabetes and the risk of late stillbirth: a case‐control study from England, UK. BJOG. 2019; 126: 973‐ 982. 30891907
  22. [30]Patel EM, Goodnight WH, James AH, Grotegut CA. Temporal trends in maternal medical conditions and stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212(673): e1‐ e11. 25530599
  23. [31]Man J, Hutchinson JC, Ashworth M, Heazell AE, Jeffrey I, Sebire NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: contemporary demographic features of >1000 cases from an urban population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 591‐ 595. 27781322
  24. [32]Koivunen S, Kajantie E, Torkki A, et al. The changing face of gestational diabetes: the effect of the shift from risk factor‐based to comprehensive screening. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015; 173: 623‐ 632. 26282598
  25. [33]O’Sullivan EP, Avalos G, O’Reilly M, Dennedy MC, Gaffney G, Dunne F. Atlantic diabetes in pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 1670‐ 1675. 21494772
  26. [34]Townsend R, Sileo FG, Allotey J, et al. Prediction of stillbirth: an umbrella review of evaluation of prognostic variables. BJOG. 2021; 128: 238‐ 250. 32931648
  27. [35]Lau YZ, Widdows K, Roberts SA, et al. Assessment of the quality, content and perceived utility of local maternity guidelines in hospitals in England implementing the saving babies' lives care bundle to reduce stillbirth. BMJ Open Qual. 2020; 9: e000756. PMC7254132 32327423
  28. [37]Nijkamp JW, Sebire NJ, Bouman K, Korteweg FJ, Erwich J, Gordijn SJ. Perinatal death investigations: what is current practice? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22: 167‐ 175. 28325580 PMC7118457
  29. [38]Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJ, Timmer A, et al. Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 53.e1‐ 53.e12. 22196684
  30. [39]Korteweg FJ, Gordijn SJ, Timmer A, et al. The tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter‐rater agreement. BJOG. 2006; 113: 393‐ 401. 16553651
  31. [40]Page JM, Christiansen‐Lindquist L, Thorsten V, et al. Diagnostic tests for evaluation of stillbirth: results from the stillbirth collaborative research network. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 699‐ 706. 28333795 PMC12935483
  32. [41]Liu ZN, Jiang Y, Liu XQ, et al. MiRNAs in gestational diabetes mellitus: potential mechanisms and clinical applications. J Diabetes Res. 2021; 2021: 4632745. 34869778 PMC8635917

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muin, D. A., Pfeifer, B., Helmer, H., Oberaigner, W., Leitner, H., Kiss, H., & Neururer, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Tirol Kliniken (AT)
  • UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
Corresponding author
Muin, Dana A.
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-23
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
396-404
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W4213302008
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, universal screening, antepartum stillbirth, intrauterine fetal death, oral glucose tolerance test, screening program implementation, high-risk pregnancy, body mass index, perinatal outcomes, number needed to screen, cost-effectiveness, maternal health policy, Austria, population-based study, 75 g OGTT
MeSH terms
Austria, Female, Fetal Death, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review