Cited by 23Glaucoma and retinal disordersRetinal and Optic ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Distinguishing ischaemic optic neuropathy from optic neuritis by ganglion cell analysis

Erlich‐Malona, Natalie, Mendoza‐Santiesteban, Carlos E., Hedges, Thomas R., Patel, Nimesh, Monaco, Caitlin, Cole, Emily·2016·Acta Ophthalmologica

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether a pattern of altitudinal ganglion cell loss, as detected and measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), can be used to distinguish non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) from optic neuritis (ON) during the acute phase, and whether the rate or severity of ganglion cell loss differs between the two diseases. Methods We performed a retrospective, case-control study of 44 patients (50 eyes) with ON or NAION and 44 age-matched controls. Non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy and ON patients had OCT at presentation and four consecutive follow-up visits. Controls had OCT at one point in time. The ganglion cell complex (GCC) was evaluated in the macula, and the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) was evaluated in the peripapillary region. Ganglion cell complex thickness, RNFL thickness and GCC mean superior and inferior hemispheric difference were compared between NAION and ON patients at each time-point using unpaired t-tests and between disease and control subjects at first measurement using paired t-tests. Results Mean time from onset of symptoms to initial presentation was 10.7 ± 6.6 days in NAION and 11.7 ± 8.6 days in ON (p = 0.67). There was a significantly greater vertical hemispheric difference in GCC thickness in NAION patients than ON patients at all time-points (5.5-10.7 μm versus 3.1-3.6 μm, p = 0.01-0.049). Mean GCC thickness was significantly decreased at less than 2 weeks after onset in NAION compared to age-matched controls…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aos.13128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessing GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology.

    “Assessing the GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology. 80 -83”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erlich‐Malona, N., Mendoza‐Santiesteban, C. E., Hedges, T. R., Patel, N., Monaco, C., & Cole, E.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Mendoza‐Santiesteban, Carlos E.
Venue
Acta Ophthalmologica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
e721-e726
ISSN
  • 0001-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-375X
  • 1755-3768
OpenAlex
W2466564999
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Ophthalmologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001064)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
optic neuritis, ganglion cell complex thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, differential diagnosis, disease progression, optical coherence tomography
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Optic Neuritis, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic, Tomography, Optical Coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review