Distinguishing ischaemic optic neuropathy from optic neuritis by ganglion cell analysis
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether a pattern of altitudinal ganglion cell loss, as detected and measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), can be used to distinguish non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) from optic neuritis (ON) during the acute phase, and whether the rate or severity of ganglion cell loss differs between the two diseases. Methods We performed a retrospective, case-control study of 44 patients (50 eyes) with ON or NAION and 44 age-matched controls. Non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy and ON patients had OCT at presentation and four consecutive follow-up visits. Controls had OCT at one point in time. The ganglion cell complex (GCC) was evaluated in the macula, and the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) was evaluated in the peripapillary region. Ganglion cell complex thickness, RNFL thickness and GCC mean superior and inferior hemispheric difference were compared between NAION and ON patients at each time-point using unpaired t-tests and between disease and control subjects at first measurement using paired t-tests. Results Mean time from onset of symptoms to initial presentation was 10.7 ± 6.6 days in NAION and 11.7 ± 8.6 days in ON (p = 0.67). There was a significantly greater vertical hemispheric difference in GCC thickness in NAION patients than ON patients at all time-points (5.5-10.7 μm versus 3.1-3.6 μm, p = 0.01-0.049). Mean GCC thickness was significantly decreased at less than 2 weeks after onset in NAION compared to age-matched controls…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assessing GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology.
“Assessing the GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology. 80 -83”
From The use of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [81]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saidha, S., Green, A. J., Leocani, L., Vidal-Jordana, A., Kenney, R. C., Bsteh, G., Outteryck, O., Thompson, A., Montalban, X., Coetzee, T., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00275-3 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Erlich‐Malona, N., Mendoza‐Santiesteban, C. E., Hedges, T. R., Patel, N., Monaco, C., & Cole, E.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mendoza‐Santiesteban, Carlos E.
- Venue
- Acta Ophthalmologica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e721-e726
- ISSN
- 0001-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-375X
- 1755-3768
- OpenAlex
- W2466564999
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Ophthalmologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001064)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- optic neuritis, ganglion cell complex thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, differential diagnosis, disease progression, optical coherence tomography
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Optic Neuritis, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic, Tomography, Optical Coherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review