Schizophrenia: An exploration of an acceptance, mindfulness, and compassion-based group intervention
Open accessAbstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and apply a brief (five‐session) group‐based intervention called Compassionate, Mindful and Accepting approach to Psychosis (CMAP) for patients diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.MethodsThe intervention was based on three major approaches: the mindfulness framework adapted for psychosis with the proposed modifications for meditation work, the rationales from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Compassion‐Focused Therapy adapted to psychosis. The intervention was in group format, with one therapist (five 1‐hr sessions). Five patients (male, single, between 22 and 35 years old, Caucasian) completed the intervention. Participants completed self‐report measures at baseline (1-week prior to intervention) and post‐treatment (1-week—additionally the Satisfaction with Intervention Questionnaire).ResultsThe intervention seemed acceptable for all participants. For illustration of potential benefits of this approach, pre‐post results are presented and discussed for two patients. Overall, there was improvement in both patients, although in different measures. Both patients’ conviction in paranoid delusions decreased, while an increase in acting with awareness was observed.ConclusionsAlthough preliminary, the results are in line with previous research in psychosis. Future directions and clinical implications are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several research studies have documented the noteworthy impact of cognitive diffusion on the psychological adaptability of individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.
“Furthermore, several research studies have documented the noteworthy impact of cognitive diffusion on the psychological adaptability of individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (45–47).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Martins, M. J., Castilho, P., Santos, V., & Gumley, A.
- Affiliations
- Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga (PT)
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Community Mental Health Team, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre,
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Martins, Maria João
- Venue
- Australian Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 514-523
- ISSN
- 0005-0067 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-9544
- OpenAlex
- W2409985684
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Australian Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- paranoid schizophrenia, group intervention, acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, delusions, treatment acceptability, brief psychotherapy, acting with awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review