Cited by 30Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNeonatal and Maternal Infections

The Global Network Neonatal Cause of Death algorithm for low‐resource settings

Open access
Garces, Ana L., McClure, Elizabeth M., Pérez, Wilton, Hambidge, K Michael, Krebs, Nancy F., Figueroa, Lester, Bose, Carl L., Carlo, Waldemar A. +17 more·2017·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim: This study estimated the causes of neonatal death using an algorithm for low‐resource areas, where 98% of the world's neonatal deaths occur. Methods: We enrolled women in India, Pakistan, Guatemala, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya and Zambia from 2014 to 2016 and tracked their delivery and newborn outcomes for up to 28 days. Antenatal care and delivery symptoms were collected using a structured questionnaire, clinical observation and/or a physical examination. The Global Network Cause of Death algorithm was used to assign the cause of neonatal death, analysed by country and day of death. Results: One‐third (33.1%) of the 3068 neonatal deaths were due to suspected infection, 30.8% to prematurity, 21.2% to asphyxia, 9.5% to congenital anomalies and 5.4% did not have a cause of death assigned. Prematurity and asphyxia‐related deaths were more common on the first day of life (46.7% and 52.9%, respectively), while most deaths due to infection occurred after the first day of life (86.9%). The distribution of causes was similar to global data reported by other major studies. Conclusion: The Global Network algorithm provided a reliable cause of neonatal death in low‐resource settings and can be used to inform public health strategies to reduce mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.13805

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 30

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Laxminarayan, R.Temmerman, M., Walker, N., editors. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities. Third. Vol. 2. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; 2016.

Authors
Garces, A. L., McClure, E. M., Pérez, W., Hambidge, K. M., Krebs, N. F., Figueroa, L., Bose, C. L., Carlo, W. A., Tenge, C., Esamai, F., Goudar, S. S., Saleem, S., Patel, A. B., Chiwila, M., Chomba, E., Tshefu, A., Derman, R. J., Hibberd, P. L., Bucher, S., Liechty, E. A., Bauserman, M., Moore, J. L., Koso‐Thomas, M., Miodovnik, M., & Goldenberg, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (GT)
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Moi University (KE)
  • KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Lata Medical Research Foundation (IN)
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM)
  • University of Zambia (ZM)
  • Ecole de santé publique de Kinshasa (CD)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • NICHD Bethesda MD USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Garces, Ana L.
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-05
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
904-911
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2593984057
Cited by
30
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01U01 HD040477, U01 HD040657, U01 HD058322, U01 HD058326, U01 HD040636)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
neonatal mortality, causes of death, resource-limited settings, suspected infection, preterm birth, asphyxia, congenital malformations, prenatal care, delivery outcomes, neonatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cause of Death, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review