Cited by 24Agricultural Innovations and PracticesCooperative Studies and EconomicsAgricultural Development and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia

Open access
Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma·2024·Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

Abstract

Agricultural cooperatives are increasingly being viewed as an effective means of promoting agricultural technologies in developing countries. This paper examines the effects of cooperative membership on inorganic fertilizer use intensity. Employing a three‐wave panel dataset relating to smallholder maize farmers in Ethiopia, we model inorganic fertilizer application as a two‐step decision‐making process involving both fertilizer adoption and its use intensity. To reflect these two related steps, we use a double‐hurdle model. We account for unobservable household heterogeneity and endogeneity utilizing a correlated random‐effects framework and a control function approach. The findings reveal that cooperative membership increased inorganic fertilizer use intensity, as well as the probability of it being used in the first place by 4.2% and 5.3%, respectively. Following further examination of who benefits most among cooperative members, we discovered that membership benefits all farmers in terms of fertilizer use intensity, irrespective of the members’ poverty status. However, we did not observe a significant effect of cooperative membership on the likelihood of fertilizer use by land‐poor and less asset‐endowed households. This highlights the necessity of implementing policies that provide poor and marginalized Ethiopian maize farmers with resources that enhance the contribution agricultural cooperatives make to their well‐being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apce.12446

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/apce.12035 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s12571-015-0488-z · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.003 · DOI
  5. Adamie B. A., 2018, Environmental production factors and efficiency of smallholder agricultural households: Using non‐parametric conditional frontier methods, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 1
  6. 10.1186/s40100-017-0075-z · DOI
  7. 10.1111/agec.12329 · DOI
  8. 10.1515/9781400829828 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/agec.12533 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s12571-019-00981-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/03031853.2021.1984958 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.041 · DOI
  14. Bastida M. Olveira A. &Vázquez Taín M. Á.(2022).Are cooperatives gender sensitive? A confirmatory and predictive analysis of women's collective entrepreneurship.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12405 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.08.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.023 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1536867X0900900405 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.01.008 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90094-X · DOI
  20. 10.2307/1909582 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/1467-9361.00175 · DOI
  22. CSA, 2016, Agricultural sample survey (2015/16): Report on area, production and farm management practice of belg season crops for private peasant holdings
  23. CSA, 2018, Agricultural sample survey (2017/18): Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season)
  24. CSA, 2019, Agricultural sample survey (2018/19): Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season)
  25. 10.1111/agec.12538 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/ajae/aar006 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103588 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/451461 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/1913475 · DOI
  31. Geffersa A. G., 2019, Technology adoption and technical efficiency in maize production in rural Ethiopia, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 14, 184
  32. 10.1111/1467-8489.12489 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/00036846.2021.1963415 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00460.x · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s12571-015-0518-x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/apce.12390 · DOI
  37. 10.1081/ETC-120039606 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.008 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.07.001 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.009 · DOI
  41. 10.5539/jas.v9n5p124 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/21665095.2014.978981 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/ajae/aat017 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.024 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.04.002 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/apce.12411 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.009 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/1477-9552.12465 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/apce.12326 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120160 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/00220388.2016.1171849 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/apce.12316 · DOI
  54. MoFED, 2006, A Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP) (2005–2010)
  55. MoFED, 2012, Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) 2010/11–2014/15
  56. 10.2307/1913646 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1111/apce.12371 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/ajae/aaq122 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5 · DOI
  60. Singh I., 1986, Agricultural household models: extensions, applications, and policy, 17
  61. 10.2307/1243664 · DOI
  62. 10.3982/ECTA7749 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1080/19439342.2022.2130961 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.010 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/agec.12539 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/jid.3240 · DOI
  67. Tessema Y. M., 2016, Do neighbours matter in technology adoption? The case of conservation tillage in northwest Ethiopia, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 11, 211
  68. 10.1111/agec.12128 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007 · DOI
  70. 10.3389/fsufs.2021.758724 · DOI
  71. Wooldridge J. M., 2010, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data
  72. Wooldridge J. M., 2013, Introduction to econometrics: A modern approach
  73. 10.3368/jhr.50.2.420 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022 · DOI
  75. Wossen T., 2018, Estimating returns to fertilizer adoption with unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Ethiopia, Food and Energy Security, 8, 10.1002/fes3.156 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101334 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/apce.12417 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Geffersa, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma
Venue
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
327-361
ISSN
  • 1370-4788 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8292
OpenAlex
W4382022960
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
Keywords
agricultural cooperatives, cooperative membership, inorganic fertilizer use, fertilizer adoption, maize farmers, smallholder farmers, double hurdle model, control functions, poverty, asset endowments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/apce.12446
The paper
Geffersa, A. G. (2024). Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12446