The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia
Open accessAbstract
Agricultural cooperatives are increasingly being viewed as an effective means of promoting agricultural technologies in developing countries. This paper examines the effects of cooperative membership on inorganic fertilizer use intensity. Employing a three‐wave panel dataset relating to smallholder maize farmers in Ethiopia, we model inorganic fertilizer application as a two‐step decision‐making process involving both fertilizer adoption and its use intensity. To reflect these two related steps, we use a double‐hurdle model. We account for unobservable household heterogeneity and endogeneity utilizing a correlated random‐effects framework and a control function approach. The findings reveal that cooperative membership increased inorganic fertilizer use intensity, as well as the probability of it being used in the first place by 4.2% and 5.3%, respectively. Following further examination of who benefits most among cooperative members, we discovered that membership benefits all farmers in terms of fertilizer use intensity, irrespective of the members’ poverty status. However, we did not observe a significant effect of cooperative membership on the likelihood of fertilizer use by land‐poor and less asset‐endowed households. This highlights the necessity of implementing policies that provide poor and marginalized Ethiopian maize farmers with resources that enhance the contribution agricultural cooperatives make to their well‐being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010 · Cited by 594
Research works printed but not linked: 77
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12035 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12571-015-0488-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.003 · DOI
- Adamie B. A., 2018, Environmental production factors and efficiency of smallholder agricultural households: Using non‐parametric conditional frontier methods, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 1
- 10.1186/s40100-017-0075-z · DOI
- 10.1111/agec.12329 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400829828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/agec.12533 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12571-019-00981-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/03031853.2021.1984958 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.041 · DOI
- Bastida M. Olveira A. &Vázquez Taín M. Á.(2022).Are cooperatives gender sensitive? A confirmatory and predictive analysis of women's collective entrepreneurship.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.023 · DOI
- 10.1177/1536867X0900900405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90094-X · DOI
- 10.2307/1909582 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9361.00175 · DOI
- CSA, 2016, Agricultural sample survey (2015/16): Report on area, production and farm management practice of belg season crops for private peasant holdings
- CSA, 2018, Agricultural sample survey (2017/18): Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season)
- CSA, 2019, Agricultural sample survey (2018/19): Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season)
- 10.1111/agec.12538 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aar006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103588 · DOI
- 10.1086/451461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018 · DOI
- 10.2307/1913475 · DOI
- Geffersa A. G., 2019, Technology adoption and technical efficiency in maize production in rural Ethiopia, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 14, 184
- 10.1111/1467-8489.12489 · DOI
- 10.1080/00036846.2021.1963415 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00460.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s12571-015-0518-x · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12390 · DOI
- 10.1081/ETC-120039606 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.009 · DOI
- 10.5539/jas.v9n5p124 · DOI
- 10.1080/21665095.2014.978981 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aat017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12411 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1111/1477-9552.12465 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12326 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120160 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2016.1171849 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12316 · DOI
- MoFED, 2006, A Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP) (2005–2010)
- MoFED, 2012, Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) 2010/11–2014/15
- 10.2307/1913646 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/apce.12371 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aaq122 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5 · DOI
- Singh I., 1986, Agricultural household models: extensions, applications, and policy, 17
- 10.2307/1243664 · DOI
- 10.3982/ECTA7749 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19439342.2022.2130961 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1111/agec.12539 · DOI
- 10.1002/jid.3240 · DOI
- Tessema Y. M., 2016, Do neighbours matter in technology adoption? The case of conservation tillage in northwest Ethiopia, African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 11, 211
- 10.1111/agec.12128 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.007 · DOI
- 10.3389/fsufs.2021.758724 · DOI
- Wooldridge J. M., 2010, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data
- Wooldridge J. M., 2013, Introduction to econometrics: A modern approach
- 10.3368/jhr.50.2.420 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.022 · DOI
- Wossen T., 2018, Estimating returns to fertilizer adoption with unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Ethiopia, Food and Energy Security, 8, 10.1002/fes3.156 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101334 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12417 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Geffersa, A. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma
- Venue
- Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-06-26
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-361
- ISSN
- 1370-4788 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8292
- OpenAlex
- W4382022960
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Keywords
- agricultural cooperatives, cooperative membership, inorganic fertilizer use, fertilizer adoption, maize farmers, smallholder farmers, double hurdle model, control functions, poverty, asset endowments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/apce.12446
- The paper
- Geffersa, A. G. (2024). Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12446