The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The environmental occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is generally described as ubiquitous in natural settings, such as soil and water. However, because anecdotal observations and published reports have questioned whether or not this description is true, we undertook a rigorous study using three methods to investigate the occurrence of P. aeruginosa: We investigated environmental samples, analyzed 16S rRNA data, and undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published data. The environmental sample screening identified P. aeruginosa as significantly associated with hydrocarbon and pesticide‐contaminated environments and feces, as compared to uncontaminated environments in which its prevalence was relatively low. The 16S rRNA data analysis showed that P. aeruginosa sequences were present in all habitats but were most abundant in samples from human and animals. Similarly, the meta‐analysis revealed that samples obtained from environments with intense human contact had a higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa compared to those with less human contact. Thus, we found a clear tendency of P. aeruginosa to be present in places closely linked with human activity. Although P. aeruginosa may be ubiquitous in nature, it is usually scarce in pristine environments. Thus, we suggest that P. aeruginosa should be described as a bacterium largely found in locations associated with human activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“P. aeruginosa was found in only 12% of uncontaminated samples, with higher distribution in animal faeces and compost (32%) compared with soil and rhizosphere (7%) or environmental water (0%).”
From Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“However, recent investigations suggest that the generalized definition of P. aeruginosa as being widespread in nature may need to be reassessed2.”
From Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Studies indicate that P. aeruginosa is generally rare in pristine environments but shows a higher prevalence in areas impacted by human activities (Fig. 1b).”
From Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“These conclusions align with older reports23,24 stating that waters polluted by humans or animals, such as sewages or urban rivers, are the most frequent sources of P. aeruginosa, suggesting that environments containing human and animal faeces are important natural reservoirs for P. aeruginosa2.”
From Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Overall, the occurrence of P. aeruginosa in the environment is closely associated with high human activity compared with unpolluted habitats2.”
From Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700 · Cited by 17,648
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
Pseudomonas aeruginosa : new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses
Gellatly, S. L., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2013) · Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1111/2049-632x.12033 · Cited by 1,295
Pletzer, D., Braun, Y., & Weingart, H. (2016) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-016-0675-8 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ecology, evolution, pathogenesis and antimicrobial susceptibility
Letizia, M., Diggle, S. P., & Whiteley, M. (2025) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-025-01193-8 · Cited by 231
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crone, S., Vives‐Flórez, M., Kvich, L., Saunders, A. M., Malone, M., Nicolaisen, M. H., Martínez‐García, E., Rojas‐Acosta, C., Catalina Gomez‐Puerto, M., Calum, H., Whiteley, M., Kolter, R., & Bjarnsholt, T.
- Venue
- APMIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-18
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 220-231
- ISSN
- 0903-4641 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0463
- OpenAlex
- W2984502911
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The environmental occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/apm.13010
- The paper
- Crone, S., Vives‐Flórez, M., Kvich, L., Saunders, A. M., Malone, M., Nicolaisen, M. H., Martínez‐García, E., Rojas‐Acosta, C., Catalina Gomez‐Puerto, M., Calum, H., Whiteley, M., Kolter, R., & Bjarnsholt, T. (2020). The environmental occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. APMIS. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.