The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robot‐assisted therapy for improving social interactions and activity participation among institutionalized older adults: A pilot study
Abstract
Introduction: Animal‐assisted therapy is gaining popularity as part of therapeutic activities for older adults in many long‐term care facilities. However, concerns about dog bites, allergic responses to pets, disease, and insufficient available resources to care for a real pet have led to many residential care facilities to ban this therapy. There are situations where a substitute artificial companion, such as robotic pet, may serve as a better alternative. Methods: This pilot study used a one‐group pre‐ and posttest design to evaluate the effect of a robot‐assisted therapy for older adults. Sixteen eligible participants participated in the study and received a group robot‐assisted therapy using a seal‐like robot pet for 30 minutes twice a week for 4 weeks. All participants received assessments of their communication and interaction skills using the A ssessment of C ommunication and I nteraction S kills (ACIS‐C) and activity participation using the A ctivity P articipation S cale at baseline and at week 4. Results: A total of 12 participants completed the study. Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that participants' communication and interaction skills (z = −2.94, P = 0.003) and activity participation (z = −2.66, P = 0.008) were significantly improved after receiving 4‐week robot‐assisted therapy. Discussion: By interacting with a robot pet, such as Paro, the communication, interaction skills, and activity participation of the older adults can be improved. The robot‐assisted therapy can be provided as a routine activity program and has the potential to improve social health of older adults in residential care facilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In some settings, simple alternatives, such as plush toys or digital programs, produce similar benefits, depending on preferences and care context [32,40,46].”
From The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Pet Therapy in Improving the Care of Patients: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
The Psychosocial Effects of a Companion Robot: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 · Cited by 546
Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly – A Mini-Review
Shibata, T., & Wada, K. (2011) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000319015 · Cited by 437
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K., & Tanie, K. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.2005.1570535 · Cited by 288
Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S. (2008) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/memb.2008.919496 · Cited by 229
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.archger.2005.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2165/00002512-200320130-00003 · DOI
- Forsyth K., 1999, The Assessment of Communication and Interaction Skills (ACIS): measurement properties, Br J Occup Ther, 62, 69, 10.1177/030802269906200208 · DOI
- 10.1080/07380570801991818 · DOI
- 10.1177/153331750401900209 · DOI
- 10.1093/fampra/cml071 · DOI
- 10.1177/153331750301800610 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2000.894600 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSMC.1999.825403 · DOI
- 10.1163/156855309X408826 · DOI
- StiehlW.D. LiebermanJ. BreazealC. BaselL. LallaL. WolfM.(2005)Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational affective touch. Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2005. Conference Proceedings. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on pp.408–415. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513813 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2007.906261 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IROS.2003.1249302 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care
Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815 · Cited by 583
Whelan, S., Murphy, K., Barrett, E., Krusche, C., Santorelli, A., & Casey, D. (2018) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0471-x · Cited by 162
“These aim to reduce social isolation, improve quality of life and support people in their social interactions [5-9].”
Mini: A New Social Robot for the Elderly
Salichs, M. A., Castro-González, Á., Salichs, E., Fernández-Rodicio, E., Maroto-Gómez, M., Gamboa-Montero, J. J., Marques-Villarroya, S., Castillo, J. C., Alonso-Martín, F., & Malfaz, M. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00687-0 · Cited by 145
Vogan, A. A., Alnajjar, F., Gochoo, M., & Khalid, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2966819 · Cited by 63
Mahmoudi Asl, A., Molinari Ulate, M., Franco Martin, M., & van der Roest, H. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/37434 · Cited by 50
Mahmoudi Asl, A., Kouters, S., Castro-González, Á., Van der Roest, H., Franco Martin, M., & Dröes, R.-M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/44125 · Cited by 12
Trajbarič, T., Muršec, D., Svenšek, A., Štiglic, G., & Gosak, L. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16104683
Metadata
- Authors
- Sung, H., Chang, S., Chin, M., & Lee, W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Nursing Tzu Chi College of Technology & Director Taiwanese Centre for Evidence‐Based Health Care Hualien Taiwan
- Department of Nursing Tzu Chi College of Technology Hualien Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences Tzu Chi College of Technology Hualien Taiwan
- Venue
- Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1758-5864
- 1758-5872
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Tzu Chi College of Technology (TCCT991A25)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review