The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review: predicting and optimising response to anti‐TNF therapy in Crohn's disease – algorithm for practical management
Abstract
Summary: Background: Nonresponse and loss of response to anti‐TNF therapies in Crohn's disease represent significant clinical problems for which clear management guidelines are lacking. Aim: To review the incidence, mechanisms and predictors of primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to formulate practical clinical algorithms to guide management. Methods: Through a systematic literature review, 503 articles were identified which fit the inclusion criteria. Results: Primary nonresponse to anti‐TNF treatment affects 13–40% of patients. Secondary loss of response to anti‐TNF occurs in 23–46% of patients when determined according to dose intensification, and 5–13% of patients when gauged by drug discontinuation rates. Recent evidence suggests that the mechanisms underlying primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response are multifactorial and include disease characteristics (phenotype, location, severity); drug (pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic or immunogenicity) and treatment strategy (dosing regimen) related factors. Clinical algorithms that employ therapeutic drug monitoring (using anti‐TNF tough levels and anti‐drug antibody levels) may be used to determine the underlying cause of primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response respectively and guide clinicians as to which patients are most likely to respond to anti‐TNF therapy and help optimise drug therapy for those who are losing response to anti‐TNF therapy. Conclusions: Nonresponse or loss of response to anti‐TNF occurs commonly in Crohn's disease. Clinical algorithms utilising therapeutic drug monitoring may establish the mechanisms for treatment failure and help guide the subsequent therapeutic approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vermeire, S., Noman, M., Van Assche, G., Baert, F., Van Steen, K., Esters, N., Joossens, S., Bossuyt, X., & Rutgeerts, P. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00701-7 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Ponsioen, C. Y., de Groof, E. J., Eshuis, E. J., Gardenbroek, T. J., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Hart, A., Warusavitarne, J., Buskens, C. J., van Bodegraven, A. A., Brink, M. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30248-0 · Cited by 367
Self-citationDulai, P. S., Singh, S., Jiang, X., Peerani, F., Narula, N., Chaudrey, K., Whitehead, D., Hudesman, D., Lukin, D., Swaminath, A., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.236 · Cited by 320
Mitrev, N., Vande Casteele, N., Seow, C. H., Andrews, J. M., Connor, S. J., Moore, G. T., Barclay, M., Begun, J., Bryant, R., Chan, W., et al. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.14368 · Cited by 282
Gisbert, J. P., & Chaparro, M. (2020) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz195 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, N. S., Hart, A., & De Cruz, P.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-51
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W1940760407
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.