The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background: The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a 7‐point scale used extensively in clinical practice and research for stool form measurement, which has undergone limited validity and reliability testing. Aim: To determine the validity and reliability of the BSFS in measuring stool form in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS‐D). Methods: One hundred and sixty‐nine healthy volunteers provided a stool sample and used the BSFS to classify stool form, which was compared with measured stool water content and with values from 19 patients with IBS‐D. Eighty‐six volunteers used the BSFS to classify 26 stool models to determine accuracy and reliability. Results: Volunteers’ classifications of stool type correlated with stool water (Spearman's rho = 0.491, P < 0.001), which increased in hard (Types 1–2), normal (Types 3–5) and loose stools (Types 6–7) (P < 0.001). The BSFS detected differences in stool form between healthy volunteers (mean 3.7, s.d. 1.5) and IBS‐D patients (mean 5.0, s.d. 1.2) (P < 0.001). Overall, 977/1204 (81%) stool models were correctly classified (substantial accuracy, κ = 0.78), although <80% of Types 2, 3, 5 and 6 were classified correctly. On 852/1118 (76%) occasions, volunteers classified covert duplicate models to the same stool type (substantial reliability, κ = 0.72), but with only moderate reliability for Types 2 (63%, κ = 0.57) and 3 (62%, κ = 0.55). Conclusions: The BSFS demonstrated substantial validity and reliability, although difficulties arose around clinical decision points (Types 2, 3, 5, 6) that warrant investigation in larger clinical populations. Potential for improving validity and reliability through modifications to the BSFS or training in its use should be explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Longstreth, G. F., Thompson, W. G., Chey, W. D., Houghton, L. A., Mearin, F., & Spiller, R. C. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061 · Cited by 4,856
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time
Lewis, S. J., & Heaton, K. W. (1997) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3109/00365529709011203 · Cited by 3,244
High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l · Cited by 3,034
Lacy, B. E., Mearin, F., Chang, L., Chey, W. D., Lembo, A. J., Simren, M., & Spiller, R. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031 · Cited by 2,866
Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study.
Heaton, K. W., Radvan, J., Cripps, H., Mountford, R. A., Braddon, F. E., & Hughes, A. O. (1992) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.33.6.818 · Cited by 733
Staudacher, H. M., Lomer, M. C. E., Anderson, J. L., Barrett, J. S., Muir, J. G., Irving, P. M., & Whelan, K. (2012) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.112.159285 · Cited by 590
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 2012, Guidance for Industry: Irritable Bowel Syndrome ‐ Clinical Evaluation of Drugs for Treatment
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cox, S. R., Lindsay, J. O., Fromentin, S., Stagg, A. J., McCarthy, N. E., Galleron, N., Ibraim, S. B., Roume, H., Levenez, F., Pons, N., et al. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.024 · Cited by 386
Self-citationMohr, A. E., Jäger, R., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Townsend, J. R., West, N. P., Black, K., Gleeson, M., Pyne, D. B., et al. (2020) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-020-00353-w · Cited by 378
Microbiota composition and metabolism are associated with gut function in Parkinson's disease
Cirstea, M. S., Yu, A. C., Golz, E., Sundvick, K., Kliger, D., Radisavljevic, N., Foulger, L. H., Mackenzie, M., Huan, T., Finlay, B. B., et al. (2020) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.28052 · Cited by 326
Svolos, V., Hansen, R., Nichols, B., Quince, C., Ijaz, U. Z., Papadopoulou, R., Edwards, C. A., Watson, D. G., Alghamdi, A., Brejnrod, A., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.002 · Cited by 320
Whelan, K., Martin, L. D., Staudacher, H. M., & Lomer, M. C. E. (2018) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12530 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, M. R., Raker, J. M., & Whelan, K.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Whelan, K.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 693-703
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2504563199
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- Bristol Stool Form Scale, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, stool water content, measurement validity, inter-rater reliability, healthy adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diarrhea, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
