Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longer time to recovery from acute kidney injury is associated with major adverse kidney events in patients with cirrhosis

Patidar, Kavish R., Naved, Mobasshir A., Kabir, Shaowli, Grama, Ananth, Allegretti, Andrew S., Cullaro, Giuseppe, Asrani, Sumeet K., Worden, Astin, Desai, Archita P., Ghabril, Marwan S., Nephew, Lauren D., Orman, Eric S.·2023·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
DOI 10.1111/apt.17457
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: Background: In patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury (AKI), longer time to AKI‐recovery may increase the risk of subsequent major‐adverse‐kidney‐events (MAKE). Aims: To examine the association between timing of AKI‐recovery and risk of MAKE in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Hospitalised patients with cirrhosis and AKI (n = 5937) in a nationwide database were assessed for time to AKI‐recovery and followed for 180‐days. Timing of AKI‐recovery (return of serum creatinine <0.3 mg/dL of baseline) from AKI‐onset was grouped by Acute‐Disease‐Quality‐Initiative Renal Recovery consensus: 0–2, 3–7, and >7‐days. Primary outcome was MAKE at 90‐180‐days. MAKE is an accepted clinical endpoint in AKI and defined as the composite outcome of ≥25% decline in estimated‐glomerular‐filtration‐rate (eGFR) compared with baseline with the development of de‐novo chronic‐kidney‐disease (CKD) stage ≥3 or CKD progression (≥50% reduction in eGFR compared with baseline) or new haemodialysis or death. Landmark competing‐risk multivariable analysis was performed to determine the independent association between timing of AKI‐recovery and risk of MAKE. Results: 4655 (75%) achieved AKI‐recovery: 0–2 (60%), 3–7 (31%), and >7‐days (9%). Cumulative‐incidence of MAKE was 15%, 20%, and 29% for 0–2, 3–7, >7‐days recovery groups, respectively. On adjusted multivariable competing‐risk analysis, compared to 0‐2‐days, recovery at 3–7 and >7‐days was independently associated with an increased risk for MAKE: sHR 1.45 (95% CI 1.01–2.09, p = 0.042), sHR 2.33 (95% CI 1.40–3.90, p = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Longer time to recovery is associated with an increased risk of MAKE in patients with cirrhosis and AKI. Further research should examine interventions to shorten AKI‐recovery time and its impact on subsequent outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.17457

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Patidar, K. R., Naved, M. A., Kabir, S., Grama, A., Allegretti, A. S., Cullaro, G., Asrani, S. K., Worden, A., Desai, A. P., Ghabril, M. S., Nephew, L. D., & Orman, E. S.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-07
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
1397-1406
ISSN
  • 0269-2813
  • 1365-2036
DOI
10.1111/apt.17457
Cited by
8
References
40
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.