Cited by 10Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Radiocarbon Dates from the O xford AMS S ystem: A rchaeometry Datelist 35

Open access
Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T. F. G., Brock, F., Baker, D., Ditchfield, P., Staff, R. A.·2015·Archaeometry

Abstract

This is the 35th list of AMS radiocarbon determinations measured at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Amongst some of the sites included here are the latest series of determinations from the key sites of Abydos, El Mirón, Ban Chiang, Grotte de Pigeons (Taforalt), Alepotrypa and Oberkassel, as well as others dating to the Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and later periods. Comments on the significance of the results are provided by the submitters of the material.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/arcm.12134

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The δ13C values of the six shabtis match quite well with δ13C data of ancient Ficus sycomorus samples from Egypt, −27.6‰ and −25.7‰.

    “These values seem to match quite well with δ13C data of ancient Ficus sycomorus samples from Egypt, −27.6 ‰ and −25.7 ‰, measured at the Oxford laboratory [171].”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [171]

    The Egypt Abydos, Sedment and others datelist reports δ13C values of −27.6‰ and −25.7‰ for the cited wooden samples. It identifies the −25.7‰ sample as Ficus sycomorus, but marks the −27.6‰ sample as “Ficus sycomorus?”, so the claim omits that identification uncertainty. The comparison with the shabtis is the citing authors’ own assessment. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tamarix and Acacia have δ13C values that are less negative than the shabtis.

    “However, both of these trees have δ13C values that are less negative. For example, the few Tamarix trees growing today at Mount Sedom near the Dead Sea in Israel, a hyper-arid region with 46 mm average annual rainfall (1960–2005), have δ13C values ranging from −21.1 ‰ to −22.7 ‰. Tree rings of ancient Tamarix wood uncovered at Mount Sedom have δ13C values in the range of −25.8 ‰ to −20.6 ‰, as wet”

    From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [171]

    The Egypt Abydos, Sedment and other sites passage (listed under “Iraq Kish”; page unavailable) gives δ13C values for Acacia wooden combs. Searches for Tamarix and shabtis found no measurements for either or a comparison with the Acacia samples, so our copy does not establish that the trees’ values are less negative than the shabtis’. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. REFERENCES Previous datelists can be found in the following volumes of Archaeometry: No. 1: Archaeometry 26, 1 (1984), 15-20 No. 2: Archaeometry 27, 2 (1985), 237-46 No. 3: Archaeometry 28, 1 (1986), 116-25 No. 4: Archaeometry 28, 2 (1986), 206-21 No. 5: Archaeometry 29, 1 (1987), 125-55 No. 6: Archaeometry 29, 2 (1987), 289-306 No. 7: Archaeometry 30, 1 (1988), 155-64 No. 8: Archaeometry 30, 2 (1988), 291-305 No. 9: Archaeometry 31, 2 (1989), 207-34 No. 10: Archaeometry 32, 1 (1990), 101-8 No. 11: Archaeometry 32, 2 (1990), 211-37 No. 12: Archaeometry 33, 1 (1991), 121-34 No. 13: Archaeometry 33, 2 (1991), 279-96 No. 14: Archaeometry 34, 1 (1992), 141-59 No. 15: Archaeometry 34, 2 (1992), 337-57 No. 16: Archaeometry 35, 1 (1993), 147-67 No. 17: Archaeometry 35, 2 (1993), 305-26 No. 18: Archaeometry 36, 2 (1994), 337-74 No. 19: Archaeometry 37, 1 (1995), 195-214 No. 20: Archaeometry 37, 2 (1995), 417-30 No. 21: Archaeometry 38, 1 (1996), 181-207 No. 22: Archaeometry 38, 2 (1996), 391-415 No. 23: Archaeometry 39, 1 (1997), 247-62 No. 24: Archaeometry 39, 2 (1997), 445-71 No. 25: Archaeometry 40, 1 (1998), 227-39 No. 26: Archaeometry 40, 2 (1998), 437-55 No. 27: Archaeometry 41, 1 (1999), 197-206 No. 28: Archaeometry 41, 2 (1999), 421-31 No. 29: Archaeometry 42, 1 (2000), 243-54 No. 30: Archaeometry 42, 2 (2000), 459-79 No. 31: Archaeometry 44, 3 (2002), 1-149 No. 32: Archaeometry 49, 3 (2007), S1-60 No. 33: Archaeometry 51, 2 (2009), 323-49 No. 34: Archaeometry 53, 5 (2011), 1067-84
  2. Aura Tortosa, J. E., 2007, Badegouliens et Magdaléniens du versant méditerranéen espagnol, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 104(4), 809-24.
  3. Baales, M., 2001, From lithics to spatial and social organization: interpreting the lithic distribution and raw material composition at the Final Palaeolithic site of Kettig (central Rhineland, Germany), Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 127-41.
  4. Banks, W. E., D'Errico, F., Peterson, A. T., Vanhaeren, M., Kageyama, M., Sepulchre, P., Ramstein, G., Jost, A., and Lunt, D., 2008, Human ecological niches and ranges during the LGM in Europe derived from an application of eco-cultural niche modeling, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(2), 481-91.
  5. Bouzouggar, A., Barton, R. N. E., Blockley, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Collcutt, S. N., Gale, R., Higham, T. F. G., Humphrey, L. T., Parfitt, S., Turner, E., and Ward, S., 2008, Re-evaluating the age of the Iberomaurusian in Morocco, African Archaeological Review, 25, 3-19.
  6. Brock, F., Higham, T. F. G., Ditchfield, P., and Bronk Ramsey, C., 2010, Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU), Radiocarbon, 52(1), 103-12.
  7. Chernykh, E. N., 1992, Ancient metallurgy in the USSR: the early metal age, 215-23, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  8. Conwell, E. A., 1864-6, On ancient sepulchral cairns on the Loughcrew Hills, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 9, 355-79.
  9. Crawford, H., 1925, The engraved bone objects found at Lough Crew, Co. Meath, Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, 55, 15-29.
  10. Edens, C., and Wilkinson, J. J., 1998, Southwest Arabia during the Holocene: recent archaeological developments, Journal of World Prehistory, 12(1), 55-119.
  11. Gorman, C. F., and Charoenwongsa, P., 1976, Ban Chiang: a mosaic of impressions from the first two years, Expedition, 8(4), 14-26.
  12. Grigson, C., 2012, Camels, copper and donkeys in the Early Iron Age of the Southern Levant: Timna revisited, Levant, 44(1), 82-100.
  13. Grigson, C., Gowlett, J. A. J., and Zarins, J., 1989, The camel in Arabia: a direct radiocarbon date calibrated to about 7000 bc, Journal of Archaeological Science, 15, 355-62.
  14. Haour, A., 2003, Ethnoarchaeology in the Zinder region, Republic of Niger: the site of Kufan Kanawa, Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology, 56, Archaeopress, Oxford.
  15. Hedges, R. E. M., and van Klinken, G. J., 1992, A review of current approaches to the pre-treatment of bone form radiocarbon dating by AMS, Radiocarbon, 34(3), 279-91.
  16. Hedges, R. E. M., Housley, R. A., Law, I. A., Perry, C., and Gowlett, J. A. J., 1987, Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS System: datelist 6, Archaeometry, 29, 289-306.
  17. Higham, C. F. W., Higham, T. F. G., Ciarla, R., Douka, K., Kijngam, A., and Rispoli, F., 2011, The origins of the Bronze Age of Southeast Asia, Journal of World Prehistory, 24(4), 227-74.
  18. Prideaux, G. J., Gully, G. A., Couzens, A. M., Ayliffe, L. K., Jankowski, N. R., Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Hellstrom, J. C., Gagan, M. K., and Hatcher, L. M., 2010, Timing and dynamics of Late-Pleistocene mammal extinctions in southwestern Australia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 22 157-62.
  19. Raynal, J.-P., 1980, Taforalt. Mission préhistorique et paleontologique française au Maroc: rapport d'activité pour l'année, Bulletin d'Archéologie Marocaine, 12, 69-71.
  20. Richter, D., Moser, J., Nami, M., Eiwanger, J., and Mikdad, A., 2010, New chronometric data from Ifri n'Ammar (Morocco) and the chronostratigraphy of the Middle Palaeolithic in the Western Maghreb, Journal of Human Evolution, 59(6), 672-9.
  21. Roberts, R. G., Flannery, T. F., Ayliffe, L. K., Yoshida, H., Olley, J. M., Prideaux, G. J., Laslett, G. M., Bayes, A., Smith, M. A., Jones, R., and Smith, B. L., 2001, New ages for the last Australian megafauna: continent-wide extinction about 46,000 years ago, Science, 292(5523), 1888-92.
  22. Uerpmann, M., and Uerpmann, H.-P., 2002, The appearance of the domestic camel in South-east Arabia, Journal of Oman Studies, 12, 235-60.
  23. Uerpmann, M., and Uerpmann, H.-P., in press, Archaeozoology of camels in south-eastern Arabia, in Camels in Asia and North Africa: interdisciplinary perspectives on their significance in past and present (eds. E. M. Knoll and P. A. Burger), Austrian Academy of Science Press, Vienna.
  24. White, J. C., and Hamilton, E., 2009, The transmission of Early Bronze Age technology to Thailand: new perspectives. Journal of World Prehistory, 22, 357-97.
  25. B.C, in Chronologies in Old World history, 3rd edn (ed. R. W. Ehrich), 61-76, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  26. Zarins, J. N., and Al-Badr, H., 1986, Archaeological investigation in the southern Tihama Plain II (including Sihi, 217-107 and Sharja, 217-172), 1405/1985, Atlal, The Journal of Saudi Arabian Archaeology, 10(1), 36-57.
  27. Zarins, J. N., and Zahrani, A., 1985, Investigations in the southern Tihama Plain (the sites of Athar and Sihi), 1404/1984, Atlatl, The Journal of Saudi Arabian Archaeology, 9, 65-107.

Authors
Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T. F. G., Brock, F., Baker, D., Ditchfield, P., & Staff, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art Oxford University Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QY UK
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Higham, T. F. G.
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-10
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
177-216
ISSN
  • 0003-813X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4754
OpenAlex
W1581199801
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archaeometry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
radiocarbon dates, Abydos, Ban Chiang, Taforalt, Paleolithic, Mesolithic, prehistoric archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review