The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulation of nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in aquatic animals: The functional feed additives scenario
Open accessAbstract
Considering the costs of feed costs (nearly 60% of production cost), nutrition, feeding and feed utilization are among the most important factors in commercial aquaculture. During the last decade, administration of functional feed additives has been practiced for enhancing nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities of cultured fish and shellfish. Traditionally, antibiotics were used for boosting growth performance and nutrient digestibility in commercial aquaculture. However, emergence of resistance pathogens and possible risk to human health resulted in limitation or prohibition of prophylactic administration of antibiotics. Recently, there was increasing attentions towards dietary administration of functional feed additives that include probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics for elevation of digestive enzyme activity and nutrient digestibility. The results of those studies revealed contradictory effects of different pro-, pre- or synbiotics on various fish species. It seems that the effects are species specific and related to modulation of the intestinal microbiota. In view of this issue, the present review provides a comprehensive sight on the effects of different pro-, pre- and synbiotics on digestive enzyme activity and nutrient digestibility in different species with special focus on the mode of action. In addition, the present review highlighted the gaps of existing knowledge as well as suggesting the subjects which needs additional studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Castro, C., Pérez-Jiménez, A., Coutinho, F., Pousão-Ferreira, P., Brandão, T. M., Oliva-Teles, A., & Peres, H. (2013) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.042 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., Wang, A., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02429 · Cited by 601
Self-citationUse of probiotics in aquaculture of China—a review of the past decade
Wang, A., Ran, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Ding, Q., Yang, Y., Olsen, R. E., Ringø, E., Bindelle, J., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2018.12.026 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Dadar, M., & Ringø, E.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3987-4000
- ISSN
- 1355-557X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2610887222
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulation of nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in aquatic animals: The functional feed additives scenario. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/are.13368
- The paper
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Dadar, M., & Ringø, E. (2017). Modulation of nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in aquatic animals: The functional feed additives scenario. Aquaculture Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.