Cited by 23Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceSocial Policies and Family

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

End of an era? China’s one-child policy and its unintended consequences

Abrahamson, Peter·2016·Asian Social Work and Policy Review

Abstract

At the end of 2015, China put an end to the one‐child policy (OCP), thereby terminating the largest family planning program in human history. For nearly four decades it had shaped relations between generations and between men and women to an extent never before seen. Today, China struggles with the unintended consequences of the OCP. It has resulted in the so‐called 4‐2‐1 family structure, in which the only children had four grandparents and two parents to care for them when they grew up, but where they have to shoulder the care of four grandparents and two parents when they come of age, because both cultural values and legal prescriptions foresee reciprocal care responsibilities between generations. This has led to an enormous care deficit, which triggers conflicts between both genders and generations. A second major unintended consequence has been a skewed gender ratio of only 18 women per 20 men because of the strong preference for boys, which has led to so‐called “bare branches:” Chinese men who are not able to find a spouse or have to rely on “mail‐order brides.” The paper concludes that the OCP has come to an end, but the unintended consequences prevail.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aswp.12101

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Asia Development Bank, 2016, Basic Statistics
  2. Abrahamson P. (2013).Social generations and development of welfare institutions: a comparative study of elderly care in East Asia and Scandinavia. Paper prepared for presentation to the 10th annual EASP conference Beijing Normal University Beijing Peoples Republic of China July 11–12 2013.
  3. Burkitt L. (2015)China abandons one‐child‐policy.The Wall Street Journal. 30 October.
  4. Dehlholm M. (2013).Global Capitalism and the Rise of the Market Leninist Developmental State: Chinas Developmental Model of Welfare State Viewed from the Perspective of Methodological Globalism. Master's Thesis.Copenhagen:Department of Sociology University of Copenhagen.
  5. Li N., 2010, Changing Institution and Evolution of Chinese Welfare NPOs: Cases from Urban Old Age Homes in Shanghai. Paper
  6. Mannheim K., 1963, The problem of generations, Psychoanalytic Review, 57, 378
  7. NOSOSCO, 2015, Social Protection in the Nordic Countries: Scope, Expenditure and Financing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Abrahamson, P.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Abrahamson, Peter
Venue
Asian Social Work and Policy Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-19
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
326-338
ISSN
  • 1753-1403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-1411
OpenAlex
W2521858353
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Social Work and Policy Review (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
one-child policy, family planning policy, unintended consequences, intergenerational caregiving, gender relations, gender preference, sex ratio at birth, mail-order brides, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End of an era? China’s one-child policy and its unintended consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/aswp.12101
The paper
Abrahamson, P. (2016). End of an era? China’s one-child policy and its unintended consequences. Asian Social Work and Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12101