The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Companion to Digital Humanities
Abstract
This Companion offers a thorough, concise overview of the emerging field of humanities computing. Contains 37 original articles written by leaders in the field. Addresses the central concerns shared by those interested in the subject. Major sections focus on the experience of particular disciplines in applying computational methods to research problems; the basic principles of humanities computing; specific applications and methods; and production, dissemination and archiving. Accompanied by a website featuring supplementary materials, standard readings in the field and essays to be included in future editions of the Companion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion
Mangen, A. (2008) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x · Cited by 277
Charting the Digital Literary Sphere
MURRAY, S. (2015) · Contemporary Literature · doi:10.3368/cl.56.2.311 · Cited by 38
Müller-Hansen, F., Callaghan, M. W., & Minx, J. C. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101691 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Venue
- A Companion to Digital Humanities
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 177-197
- OpenAlex
- W1564237561
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
