Cited by 48Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

A systematic review of the effect of paracetamol on blood pressure in hypertensive and non‐hypertensive subjects

Open access
Turtle, Emma J., Dear, James W., Webb, David J.·2013·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Aim: To review current evidence on the effect of paracetamol on blood pressure (BP), the quality of the previous studies and the validity of the results, and to summarize these findings. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching P ub M ed, the C ochrane library and EMBASE for publications between the years 1963 and 2012. Results: We identified three case reports, seven prospective observational trials, six randomized controlled trials, one commentary and two reviews. Some, but not all, of the observational studies, which included over 147 000 patients, showed an increased risk of hypertension with paracetamol use. The randomized studies were generally small and the results were inconsistent. Three studies, which included 104 patients, showed an increase of systolic BP by ∼4 mmHg, two studies, which included 27 patients, reported no change in BP and one study, which included 21 patients, reported a fall in BP although no placebo arm was included for comparison. Conclusions: The overall effect of paracetamol on BP is unclear. Given that paracetamol is often suggested as a safer alternative to non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), it would seem that further prospective evidence is now needed to address the effect of paracetamol on BP. This would be best done with larger studies in relevant cohorts using BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring as the primary endpoint.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.12032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 79 · Cited by 48

Authors
Turtle, E. J., Dear, J. W., & Webb, D. J.
Affiliations
The Queen's Medical Research Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Turtle, Emma J.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
1396-1405
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1953609430
Cited by
48
References
79
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
paracetamol, blood pressure, hypertension, antihypertensive effect, analgesic side effects, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review