A systematic review of the effect of paracetamol on blood pressure in hypertensive and non‐hypertensive subjects
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To review current evidence on the effect of paracetamol on blood pressure (BP), the quality of the previous studies and the validity of the results, and to summarize these findings. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching P ub M ed, the C ochrane library and EMBASE for publications between the years 1963 and 2012. Results: We identified three case reports, seven prospective observational trials, six randomized controlled trials, one commentary and two reviews. Some, but not all, of the observational studies, which included over 147 000 patients, showed an increased risk of hypertension with paracetamol use. The randomized studies were generally small and the results were inconsistent. Three studies, which included 104 patients, showed an increase of systolic BP by ∼4 mmHg, two studies, which included 27 patients, reported no change in BP and one study, which included 21 patients, reported a fall in BP although no placebo arm was included for comparison. Conclusions: The overall effect of paracetamol on BP is unclear. Given that paracetamol is often suggested as a safer alternative to non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), it would seem that further prospective evidence is now needed to address the effect of paracetamol on BP. This would be best done with larger studies in relevant cohorts using BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring as the primary endpoint.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some observational studies show an increase in blood pressure among chronic paracetamol users.
“On the other hand, the risk of worsening hypertension should be considered, with some observational studies showing an increase in blood pressure among chronic paracetamol users.97,98”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Turtle, E. J., Dear, J. W., & Webb, D. J.
- Affiliations
- The Queen's Medical Research Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turtle, Emma J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-20
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1396-1405
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- PMC
- PMC3690099
- OpenAlex
- W1953609430
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
- Keywords
- paracetamol, blood pressure, hypertension, antihypertensive effect, analgesic side effects, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Acetaminophen, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review