Cited by 113Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Quality and Safety of Herbal Medical Products: Regulation and the Need for Quality Assurance along the Value Chains

Open access
Heinrich, Michael·2015·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Herbal medicines and products derived from them are a diverse group of products for which different (and often limited) levels of evidence are available. As importantly, such products generally vary in their composition and are at the end of an often poorly understood value chain, which often links producers in biodiversity rich countries with the large markets in the North. This paper discusses the current regulatory framework of such herbal medical products (with a focus on the UK) and using examples from our own metabolomic research on Curcumal longa L. (turmeric, Zingiberaceae) how value chains impact on the composition and quality (and thus the safety) of such products. Overall, our recent research demonstrates the need for studying the links between producers and consumers of commodities produced in provider countries and that plant metabolomics offer a novel way of assessing the chemical variability along a value chain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.12586

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinrich, M.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heinrich, Michael
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
62-66
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1920414307
Cited by
113
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • London International Development Centre
  • Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
herbal medicine, quality assurance, product safety, regulatory framework, value chain, turmeric, plant metabolomics, chemical variability
MeSH terms
Humans, Legislation, Drug, Quality Control, Herbal Medicine, Curcuma, Internationality, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review