The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An improved nonparametric lower bound of species richness via a modified good–turing frequency formula
Abstract
Summary: It is difficult to accurately estimate species richness if there are many almost undetectable species in a hyper‐diverse community. Practically, an accurate lower bound for species richness is preferable to an inaccurate point estimator. The traditional nonparametric lower bound developed by Chao (1984, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11, 265–270) for individual‐based abundance data uses only the information on the rarest species (the numbers of singletons and doubletons) to estimate the number of undetected species in samples. Applying a modified Good–Turing frequency formula, we derive an approximate formula for the first‐order bias of this traditional lower bound. The approximate bias is estimated by using additional information (namely, the numbers of tripletons and quadrupletons). This approximate bias can be corrected, and an improved lower bound is thus obtained. The proposed lower bound is nonparametric in the sense that it is universally valid for any species abundance distribution. A similar type of improved lower bound can be derived for incidence data. We test our proposed lower bounds on simulated data sets generated from various species abundance models. Simulation results show that the proposed lower bounds always reduce bias over the traditional lower bounds and improve accuracy (as measured by mean squared error) when the heterogeneity of species abundances is relatively high. We also apply the proposed new lower bounds to real data for illustration and for comparisons with previously developed estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results
Bukin, Y. S., Galachyants, Y. P., Morozov, I. V., Bukin, S. V., Zakharenko, A. S., & Zemskaya, T. I. (2019) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2019.7 · Cited by 394
Integrated multi-omics of the human gut microbiome in a case study of familial type 1 diabetes
Heintz-Buschart, A., May, P., Laczny, C. C., Lebrun, L. A., Bellora, C., Krishna, A., Wampach, L., Schneider, J. G., Hogan, A., de Beaufort, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.180 · Cited by 316
Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models
Nasr, M., Carlini, N., Hayase, J., Jagielski, M., Cooper, A. F., Ippolito, D., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Wallace, E., Tramèr, F., & Lee, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.17035 · Cited by 96
Salk, H. M., Simon, W. L., Lambert, N. D., Kennedy, R. B., Grill, D. E., Kabat, B. F., & Poland, G. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162803 · Cited by 75
Anitua, E., Murias-Freijo, A., Tierno, R., Tejero, R., & Alkhraisat, M. H. (2024) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04675-y · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiu, C., Wang, Y., Walther, B. A., & Chao, A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-19
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 671-682
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2110048017
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved nonparametric lower bound of species richness via a modified good–turing frequency formula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/biom.12200
- The paper
- Chiu, C., Wang, Y., Walther, B. A., & Chao, A. (2014). An improved nonparametric lower bound of species richness via a modified good–turing frequency formula. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.