The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of systemic corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: International Eczema Council consensus statement
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines discourage the use of systemic corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis (AD), but their use remains widespread. OBJECTIVES: To reach consensus among an international group of AD experts on the use of systemic corticosteroids for AD. METHODS: A survey consisting of statements accompanied by visual analogue scales ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'neutral' to 'strongly agree' was distributed to the International Eczema Council (IEC). Consensus was reached in agreement on a statement if < 30% of respondents marked to the left of 'neutral' towards 'strongly disagree'. RESULTS: Sixty of 77 (78%) IEC members participated. Consensus was reached on 12 statements, including that systemic corticosteroids should generally be avoided but can be used rarely for severe AD under certain circumstances, including a lack of other treatment options, as a bridge to other systemic therapies or phototherapy, during acute flares in need of immediate relief, in anticipation of a major life event or in the most severe cases. If used, treatment should be limited to the short term. Most respondents agreed that systemic corticosteroids should never be used in children, but consensus was not reached on that statement. The conclusions of our expert group are limited by a dearth of high-quality published evidence. If more stringent consensus criteria were applied (e.g. requiring < 20% of respondents marking towards 'strongly disagree'), consensus would have been reached on fewer statements. CONCLUSIONS: Based on expert opinion from the IEC, routine use of systemic corticosteroids for AD is generally discouraged and should be reserved for special circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
Waljee, A. K., Rogers, M. A. M., Lin, P., Singal, A. G., Stein, J. D., Marks, R. M., Ayanian, J. Z., & Nallamothu, B. K. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1415 · Cited by 830
Cited by
Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K., & Irvine, A. D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0001-z · Cited by 1,549
Self-citationTorres, T., Ferreira, E. O., Gonçalo, M., Mendes-Bastos, P., Selores, M., & Filipe, P. (2019) · Acta Médica Portuguesa · doi:10.20344/amp.11963 · Cited by 298
Davis, D. M. R., Drucker, A. M., Alikhan, A., Bercovitch, L., Cohen, D. E., Darr, J. M., Eichenfield, L. F., Frazer-Green, L., Paller, A. S., Schwarzenberger, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.08.102 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Drucker, A. M., Eyerich, K., de Bruin-Weller, M. S., Thyssen, J. P., Spuls, P. I., Irvine, A. D., Girolomoni, G., Dhar, S., Flohr, C., Murrell, D. F., Paller, A. S., & Guttman-Yassky, E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-01-28
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 768-775
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2751469248
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of systemic corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: International Eczema Council consensus statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.15928
- The paper
- Drucker, A. M., Eyerich, K., de Bruin-Weller, M. S., Thyssen, J. P., Spuls, P. I., Irvine, A. D., Girolomoni, G., Dhar, S., Flohr, C., Murrell, D. F., Paller, A. S., & Guttman-Yassky, E. (2018). Use of systemic corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: International Eczema Council consensus statement. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.