Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed?

Somyürek, Sibel, Coşkun, Burcu Karabulut·2013·British Journal of Educational Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents tend to have excellent access to computers, the Internet, mobile telephones and multiple digital devices, and are proficient in their use.

    “These studies coincide in indicating that this segment of the population tends to have excellent access to computers, the Internet, mobile telephones and multiple digital devices, and is proficient in their use.”

    From Media and information literacy: a measurement instrument for adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Somyürek & Coşkun, 2013

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Atal D., 2011, İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Okul İçinde ve Dışında Teknoloji Kullanımları, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 24
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Corrin L. Bennett S.&Lockyer L.(2010).Digital natives: everyday life versus academic study. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning. Lancaster. · DOI
  4. European Parliament and the Council(2006).Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of Key Competences for Lifelong Learning.Official Journal of the European Union. l394. Retrieved February 12 2013 fromhttp://eur‐lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_394/l_39420061230en00100018.pdf
  5. Eurydice(2011).Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe.The Journal of Education Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Retrieved February 10 2013 fromhttp://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/eurypedia_en.php
  6. Kennedy G. Dalgarno B. Bennett S. Judd T. Gray K.&Chang R.(2008).Immigrants and natives: investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. In Hello! Where are you in the Landscape of Educational Technology? Proceedings Ascilite. Melbourne. Retrieved February 12 2013 fromhttp://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/kennedy.pdf · DOI
  7. Kıyıcı F., 2010, The definitions and preferences of science teacher candidates concerning web 2.0 tools: a phenomenological research study, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 185
  8. Kumar S.(2009).Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: survey development. In Proceedings of 8th European Conference on E‐learning (ECEL) Italy.
  9. Kumar S.(2010).The net generation's informal and educational use of new technologies in education. Retrieved February 11 2013 fromhttp://ineducation.ca/article/net‐generation‐s‐informal‐and‐educational‐use‐new‐technologies · DOI
  10. Livingstone S., 2011, Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children. Full findings
  11. McCrindle M., 2006, New generations at work: attracting, recruiting, retraining & training generation Y, 1
  12. Oblinger D. G., 2005, Educating the net generation: EDUCAUSE. An EDUCAUSE e‐book
  13. 10.1787/9789264112995‐en · DOI
  14. Orhun E.(2010).Information and communication technology innovation in education: the case of Turkey university leadership: bringing technology‐enabled education to learners of all ages. The Fifth Conference of Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC) MIT Cambridge Massachusetts. Retrieved January 28 2013 fromhttp://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/usere/library/tech_for_ed_book.pdf
  15. 10.1108/10748120110424816 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Somyürek, S., & Coşkun, B. K.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-13
Volume
44
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0007-1013
  • 1467-8535
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review