CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Online and Blended LearningInnovative Education and Learning PracticesEducation, Management, Technology, Human Resources

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critical evaluation of the contribution of trust to effective Technology Enhanced Learning in the workplace: A literature review

Short, Heather·2014·British Journal of Educational Technology
DOI 10.1111/bjet.12187
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper offers a critical review of the literature that explores the building and development of trust in workplace learning, particularly in a virtual context and its implications for T echnology E nhanced L earning ( TEL ) in business. Trust is increasingly recognised as important in both business and education, and is the focus of increasing attention in relation to the virtual environment. TEL offers a range of potential benefits, but adoption levels remain low. However, there are indications that trust may be a significant factor in both low workplace participation in TEL and its effectiveness as a learning medium. Although savings in both money and time are the main perceived advantages of TEL , this review highlights the positive role of face‐to‐face contact in increasing TEL take‐up and effectiveness, even though this diminishes cost savings. This paper highlights the scant level of research into TEL , particularly in work situations, and the extent to which trust has been overlooked in this context. In the light of this gap in knowledge, further investigations are suggested to contribute to understanding the issues affecting TEL in the workplace.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12187

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1177/108056990006300402 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/13678860701347164 · DOI
  3. Blomqvist K., 2002, Partnering in the dynamic environment: the role of trust in asymmetric technology partnership formation
  4. 10.1177/1059601106286881 · DOI
  5. Brown S. D., 2009, Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality, 209
  6. 10.1177/014920639101700307 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/978-3-322-89613-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Donath J. S., 1999, Communities in cyberspace, 27
  10. Drucker P. F., 1999, Management challenges for the 21st century
  11. Fairhurst P., 2011, Creating social networks for L&D, The Training Journal, 2011, 50
  12. 10.1080/03634520009379209 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/2214091.2214125 · DOI
  14. Gignac F., 2005, Building successful virtual teams
  15. Grover A., 2010, Cutting‐edge social media approaches to business education: teaching with Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, second life, and blogs, 7
  16. 10.1080/08838159809364462 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Handy C., 1995, Trust and the virtual organization, Harvard Business Review, 73, 40
  18. 10.1002/jsc.714 · DOI
  19. 10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Järvenpää E., 2001, Humans on the net: information and communication technology (ICT), work organization and human beings, 229
  21. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Johnson G., 2008, Exploring corporate strategy
  23. Kimble C. Li F.&Barlow A.(2000).Effective virtual teams through communities of practice. Paper 2000. · DOI
  24. Knowles M., 1990, The adult‐learner: a neglected species
  25. Kostner J., 2001, Bionic e‐teamwork: how to build collaborative virtual teams at hyperspeed
  26. Kouzes J. M., 2012, The leadership challenge: how to make extraordinary things happen in organizations
  27. Lewicki R. J., 2008, Landmark papers on trust, 388
  28. Loos E. E., 2008, The social dynamics of information and communication technology
  29. Lyon F., 2012, Handbook of research methods on trust
  30. Mason R., 2008, E‐learning and social networking handbook: resources for higher education
  31. 10.2307/258792 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/21515581.2011.552424 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Miller L., 2010, Market research for online communities in the NHS: a report to the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
  34. Moore M. G., 1993, Theoretical principles of distance education, 22
  35. Mullins L. J., 2013, Management and organisational behaviour
  36. Myers S. A., 2006, Handbook of instructional communication: rhetorical and relational perspectives, 67
  37. Ossiansson E., 2010, Cutting‐edge social media approaches to business education: teaching with Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, second life, and blogs, 117
  38. Preece J., 2011, Interaction design: beyond human‐computer interaction
  39. Rintala N., 2008, The social dynamics of information and communication technology, 133
  40. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/10919391003711050 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/03634520701573284 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1177/104973150001000409 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80058-8 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00366.x · DOI
  47. 10.1002/9780470615782.ch9 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/108056990106400108 · DOI
  49. Volchok E., 2010, Virtual teamwork: mastering the art and practice of online learning and corporate collaboration, 3
  50. Wainfan L., 2004, Challenges in virtual collaboration: videoconferencing, and audioconferencing, and computer‐mediated communications
  51. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00400.x · DOI
  52. 10.1177/009365001028001004 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/2393957 · DOI
  54. Zand D. E., 1997, The leadership triad: knowledge, trust and power

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Short, H.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Short, Heather
ORCID
Short, Heather
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-15
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1014-1022
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
DOI
10.1111/bjet.12187
OpenAlex
W2105900126
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
Keywords
trust, technology-enhanced learning, workplace learning, virtual learning environments, e-learning adoption, face-to-face contact, business education, learning effectiveness, cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review