The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The COVID‐19 pandemic has forced higher education institutions to implement online learning activities based on virtual platforms, allowing little time to prepare and train faculty members to familiarize students with digital technologies. While previous studies have looked at how students engaged with digital technologies in their learning activities, the characteristics of the student engagement in online learning remain underexplored. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature on student engagement in online learning in higher education is much needed. This article synthesizes the findings on student engagement in Latin American higher education institutions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. After reviewing the studies on online learning activities, this review examines student engagement from behavioural, cognitive and affective dimensions and identifies the main characteristics of student engagement from these tripartite dimensions. The implications of the findings for online learning in Latin American higher education are as follows: (a) to transform higher education, (b) to provide adequate professional training, (c) to improve Internet connectivity, (d) to ensure quality online learning in higher education and (e) to provide emotional support. These findings will provide valuable guidance for teachers, educational authorities and policy makers and help them make informed decisions to use effective strategies to support online learning in higher education institutions. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted the normal operation of higher education institutions across Latin America, impelling a shift from face‐to‐face instruction to online teaching and learning. Research on online learning in Latin American higher education has been conducted, but the findings and their implications are yet to be widely disseminated among researchers, practitioners and decision‐makers. What this paper adds Providing a systematic review of research on student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education institutions. Analyzing the construct of student engagement in online learning from tripartite dimensions—behavioral, cognitive and affective—in the Latin American higher education context. Identifying the characteristics associated to each dimension of student engagement in online learning. Implications for practice and/or policy The need to transform the higher education system in Latin America and beyond, at two levels: to improve Internet connectivity at the technological level and to ensure the quality of online education at the pedagogical level. The urgency to offer an adequate professional training regarding the use of new technologies in online learning environments. The significance for higher education institutions to provide emotional support for students during the COVID‐10 pandemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These challenges associated with online learning are a substantial hindrance to students’ academic adaption to online learning environments (Okan, 2020; Tüzün and Yörük Toraman, 2021; Salas-Pilco et al., 2022).”
From The relationship between tolerance for uncertainty and academic adjustment: the mediating role of students’ psychological flexibility during COVID-19 (2023) · cites this paper as Salas-Pilco et al., 2022
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“los estudios precedentes aún no recogen la percepción de los estudiantes, sino que se centran en los campos de la gestión y administración de la enseñanza (Salas-Pilco, 2022).”
From Percepciones de estudiantes latinoamericanos sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en la educación superior (2024) · cites this paper as Salas-Pilco, 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · cited 1×
“We follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, which were developed to improve the reporting of systematic reviews (Moher et al., 2015); see Figure 1.”
MethodInterrater reliability: The kappa statistic
McHugh, M. L. (2012) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2012.031 · Cited by 19,877 · cited 1×
“Next, the two authors coded 20 percent of the selected articles (5 out of 23 articles), and Cohen's kappa coefficient (1960) was used to measure intercoder reliability: moderate agreement = 0.60– 0.79, substantial agreement = 0.80– 0.90 and almost perfect agreement = 0.91– 1.00 (McHugh, 2012).”
MethodInfluential(2017) · Cited by 16,036
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 2×
“Based on the engagement dimensions proposed by Fredricks et al. (2004), student engagement in online learning can be explained as follows: a. Behavioural engagement : when online students actively participate in online learning activities. b. Cognitive engagement : when online students show…”
BackgroundFereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic.
Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020) · Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica · doi:10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397 · Cited by 8,022 · cited 1×
“…institutions to provide emotional support for students during the COVID-10 pandemic. stage in 2020 during the global public health emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (Cucinotta & Vanelli, 2020) as higher education institutions (HEIs) worldwide were compelled to switch to online instruction.”
BackgroundGuidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x17723971 · Cited by 3,467 · cited 2×
“The research questions (RQs) are as follows: RQ1: What are the main characteristics of student engagement— on the behavioural, cognitive and affective dimensions— in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic?”
MethodCovid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities
Adedoyın, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 · Cited by 3,364 · cited 1×
“…to face- to-face instruction on parameters such as learning gains, satisfaction, learning styles and study habits (Farrell & Brunton, 2020; Paulsen & McCormick, 2020), in spite of challenges in the delivery of online instruction and provision of adequate infrastructure (Adedoyin & Soykan, 2020).”
BackgroundKuh, G. D. (2003) · Change The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091380309604090 · Cited by 1,710 · cited 1×
“Student engagement is defined as the time and energy that students purposefully dedicate to learning activities (Kuh, 2003).”
BackgroundMartin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 · Cited by 1,435 · cited 2×
“There is substantial evidence that student engagement is associated with positive learning outcomes, such as good academic performance, self-regulated learning and well-being (Lin et al., 2019; Martin & Bolliger, 2018; Zhang, 2017).”
BackgroundBond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097 · cited 1×
“More engaged students are considered more likely to be academically successful (Bond et al., 2020).”
BackgroundOnline learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z · Cited by 963 · cited 1×
“Regarding online courses, Dumford and Miller (2018) also mentioned that students reported less exposure to effective teaching, which suggests that online learning might somewhat benefit or be deterrent for engagement.”
BackgroundThe Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner
Gillett‐Swan, J. K. (2017) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v9i3.293 · Cited by 751 · cited 1×
“This sudden change posed challenges to both teachers and students who were inadequately prepared for online learning because research indicates that engaging students in online learning environment is often more challenging than in traditional face- to-face courses (Gillett-Swan, 2017; Hew, 2016).”
BackgroundImpact of COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health and wellness.
Copeland, W. E., McGinnis, E., Bai, Y., Adams, Z., Nardone, H., Devadanam, V., Rettew, J., & Hudziak, J. J. (2021) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.466 · Cited by 668 · cited 1×
“Therefore, HEIs are expected to offer emotional support services, and help students and teachers develop coping strategies (Copeland et al., 2021).”
BackgroundPromoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS
Hew, K. F. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12235 · Cited by 486 · cited 2×
“This sudden change posed challenges to both teachers and students who were inadequately prepared for online learning because research indicates that engaging students in online learning environment is often more challenging than in traditional face- to- face courses (Gillett- Swan, 2017; Hew, 2016).”
BackgroundΠέλλας, Ν. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048 · Cited by 421 · cited 1×
“In terms of cognitive engagement, our findings indicate that it is crucially important to take into account motivation, positive self-perception of digital literacy, and self-regulation: Pellas (2014) also reported that these characteristics play a pivotal role in the success of online learning.”
BackgroundFerrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5 · Cited by 394 · cited 1×
“Positive attitude and previous experience with online learning platforms are found to be a strong indicator for student satisfaction and affective engagement (Ferrer et al., 2022; Kovačević et al., 2021).”
BackgroundCoping With Stress and Burnout Associated With Telecommunication and Online Learning
Mheidly, N., Fares, M. Y., & Fares, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.574969 · Cited by 355 · cited 1×
“Mheidly et al. (2020) recommended some strategies to cope with stress and anxiety during online learning, such as implementing healthy practices in between online sessions (eg, breathing exercises), promoting awareness of the physical and emotional consequences of extended online time, and allowing…”
BackgroundAt a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean
Ferreyra, M. M., Avitabile, C., Botero Álvarez, J., Haimovich Paz, F., & Urzúa, S. (2017) · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1014-5 · Cited by 321 · cited 1×
“In the present century, the Latin American higher education had a big expansion of gross enrollment rate in higher education, from 23% in 2000 to 52% in 2017; although, there is still the need to improve the quality of education (Ferreyra et al., 2017).”
BackgroundStudents’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses
Balı, S. Z., & Liu, M. C. (2018) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094 · Cited by 306 · cited 2×
“Moreover, Bali and Liu (2018) argued that online soft skills are likely to be improved in inclusive and supportive online learning environments.”
BackgroundA balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x · Cited by 233 · cited 1×
“…benefits to students compared to face- to-face instruction on parameters such as learning gains, satisfaction, learning styles and study habits (Farrell & Brunton, 2020; Paulsen & McCormick, 2020), in spite of challenges in the delivery of online instruction and provision of adequate…”
BackgroundAcademic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Online Learning: A Mini Review
Yokoyama, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794 · Cited by 215 · cited 2×
“Usually, the longer students engage in learning activities, the better their academic performance (Bravo-Agapito et al., 2021; Yokoyama, 2019).”
BackgroundReassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education
Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A. C. (2020) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19898690 · Cited by 186 · cited 2×
“…compared to face- to-face instruction on parameters such as learning gains, satisfaction, learning styles and study habits (Farrell & Brunton, 2020; Paulsen & McCormick, 2020), in spite of challenges in the delivery of online instruction and provision of adequate infrastructure (Adedoyin & Soykan,…”
BackgroundCueva, M. A. L., & Terrones, S. A. C. (2020) · Propósitos y Representaciones · doi:10.20511/pyr2020.v8nspe3.588 · Cited by 183
(1984) · Cited by 180
Student Engagement in Online Learning: A Review
Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017) · International Symposium on Educational Technology · doi:10.1109/iset.2017.17 · Cited by 158 · cited 1×
“Therefore, student engagement in online learning is a recent research area and thus requires more study (Hu & Li, 2017).”
BackgroundRealyvásquez-Vargas, A., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Baez-Lopez, Y., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Hernández-Escobedo, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12219194 · Cited by 154
Binali, T., Tsai, C., & Chang, H. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315 · Cited by 145 · cited 1×
“Highly motivated learners tend to demonstrate a high level of cognitive engagement in online learning (Binali et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSTUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC ERA: A CASE STUDY
Gustiani, S. (2020) · Holistics (Hospitality and Linguistics) Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Inggris · Cited by 140
The Evolution of Research on Digital Education
Dillenbourg, P. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“As Dillenbourg (2016) highlighted, technology does not guarantee learning; to effectively support the transition to online learning, learning activities must be appropriately designed and introduced to engage learners behaviorally, cognitively, and affectively.”
BackgroundThe Student Engagement Handbook, Practice in Higher Education
Timmis, S., & Williams, J. (2013) · Cited by 128
A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning
Landrum, B., Bannister, J. F., Garza, G. J., & Rhame, S. (2020) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592 · Cited by 128 · cited 1×
“Landrum et al. (2020) mentioned that students’ satisfaction is positively related to the course design or clarity and teacher– student interaction.”
BackgroundStudent engagement with computer-generated feedback: a case study
Zhang, Z. (2016) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccw089 · Cited by 120 · cited 1×
“There is substantial evidence that student engagement is associated with positive learning outcomes, such as good academic performance, self-regulated learning and well-being (Lin et al., 2019; Martin & Bolliger, 2018; Zhang, 2017).”
BackgroundÇebi, A., & Güyer, T. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“Self-regulated learning has become more important in online learning environments, as distance learning requires students' agency and ownership of their learning (Çebi & Güyer, 2020).”
BackgroundLaksana, D. N. L. (2021) · Journal of Education Technology · doi:10.23887/jet.v4i4.29314 · Cited by 110 · cited 1×
“The provision of broad, fast, effective and efficient Internet coverage affects the quality of online learning (Laksana, 2021”
BackgroundBravo, J., Martínez, S. J. R., & Pamplona, S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106595 · Cited by 102 · cited 1×
“Usually, the longer students engage in learning activities, the better their academic performance (Bravo-Agapito et al., 2021; Yokoyama, 2019).”
BackgroundThe impact of student engagement on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course
Lin, L.-C., Hung, I., Kinshuk, K., & Chen, N. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9 · Cited by 100 · cited 2×
“There is substantial evidence that student engagement is associated with positive learning outcomes, such as good academic performance, self-regulated learning and well-being (Lin et al., 2019; Martin & Bolliger, 2018; Zhang, 2017).”
BackgroundThe Importance of Promoting Digital Literacy in Higher Education
Santos, A. I., & de Serpa, S. N. F. (2017) · International Journal of Social Science Studies · doi:10.11114/ijsss.v5i6.2330 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“Santos and Serpa (2017) mentioned the importance of promoting digital literacy in HEIs to develop students' digital strategies and make them proficient in learning through technology.”
BackgroundFactors affecting students’ attitudes towards online learning - The case of Sofia University
Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Yovkova, B., & Aleksieva, L. (2018) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5082043 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Nowadays, higher education students use technology in everyday life, and they desire effective online learning environments and on-line support during learning activities (Peytcheva-Forsyth et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGuillén‐Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10160-0 · Cited by 63 · cited 2×
“…America, before the outbreak of the pandemic, some of the online platforms in HEIs were underused, functioning mainly as document repositories (Guillén-Gámez & Mayorga-Fernández, 2020) However, today HEIs have implemented online courses to continue the teaching and learning activities, and…”
BackgroundRecognizing Predictors of Students’ Emergency Remote Online Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19
Kovačević, I., Labrović, J. A., Petrović, N., & Kužet, I. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11110693 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“Positive attitude and previous experience with online learning platforms are found to be a strong indicator for student satisfaction and affective engagement (Ferrer et al., 2022; Kovačević et al., 2021).”
BackgroundAlonso, R. R., Navarro, C. A. T., & Barrera, O. N. (2021) · Perspectiva educacional · doi:10.4151/07189729-vol.60-iss.2-art.1175 · Cited by 53 · cited 4×
“…attitudes of students toward online learning (Cárdenas Zea et al., 2021; De la Fuente et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021), video resources (Delgado, 2021), technology usage (Romero Alonso et al., 2021) and online courses (Faria et al., 2021; Chávez-Miyauchi et al., 2021; Flores Ferro et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialFACULTY ONLINE COMPETENCE AND STUDENT AFFECTIVE ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING
Kordrostami, M., & Seitz, V. (2021) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1965891 · Cited by 51 · cited 1×
“It is worth noting that teachers' affective engagement skills influence not only students' emotional engagement but also the quality of online learning (Kordrostami & Seitz, 2021).”
BackgroundQuispe-Prieto, S., Cavalcanti‐Bandos, M. F., Caipa-Ramos, M., Paucar‐Caceres, A., & Rojas, H. (2021) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems9010015 · Cited by 49
Briggs, L. P., Trautmann, N. M., & Fournier, C. (2018) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1499015 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“As Briggs et al. (2018) pointed out, “the need exists … to support and promote more region-focused research”, particularly on the coverage and accessibility of information regarding Latin America.”
BackgroundDelgado, F. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13020035 · Cited by 44 · cited 6×
“, 2021), video resources (Delgado, 2021), technology usage (Romero Alonso et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialMyers, T., Blackman, A., Andersen, T., Hay, R., Lee, I., & Gray, H. (2014) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v7i3.194 · Cited by 36 · cited 2×
“Other examples of online engagement strategies include introducing learning activities related to communication, collaboration, discovery and search for information, active listening, and activities that require the direct involvement of students (Knopf et al., 2021; Myers et al., 2014).”
BackgroundEducação remota na continuidade da formação médica em tempos de pandemia: viabilidade e percepções
Silva, P. H. D. S., Faustino, L. R., Sobrinho, M. S. D. O., & Silva, F. B. F. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica · doi:10.1590/1981-5271v45.1-20200459 · Cited by 33 · cited 2×
“Most of the reviewed articles reported positive attitudes of students toward online learning (Cárdenas Zea et al., 2021; De la Fuente et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021), video resources (Delgado, 2021), technology usage (Romero Alonso et al., 2021) and online courses (Faria et al., 2021;…”
BackgroundVillalobos, C. P., Ventura-Ventura, J., Spormann-Romeri, C., Roberto Melipillán, A., Jara-Reyes, C., Paredes-Villarroel, X., Rojas, M., Baquedano-Rodríguez, M., Rabanal, I. F. C., Parra-Ponce, P., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250739 · Cited by 33
Ferro, E. F., Cid, F. M., Briceño, M. H., Duarte, S. A. G., Silva-Salse, Á., Peña-Troncoso, S., Castillo-Retamal, F., Flores, P. G., Cárcamo, F. P., Acevedo, V. B., et al. (2020) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v0i41.82907 · Cited by 33 · cited 3×
“…attitudes of students toward online learning (Cárdenas Zea et al., 2021; De la Fuente et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021), video resources (Delgado, 2021), technology usage (Romero Alonso et al., 2021) and online courses (Faria et al., 2021; Chávez-Miyauchi et al., 2021; Flores Ferro et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSandí-Ureña, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00803 · Cited by 32 · cited 4×
“…(Lovón Cueva & Cisneros Terrones, 2020); (c) a high percentage of tasks was completed in a timely fashion (Pérez-Villalobos et al., 2021; Sandi-Urena, 2020) and (d) active learning in virtual classrooms was similar to that in traditional face- to-face classrooms (Domínguez-Torres et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialZapata-Garibay, R., González-Fagoaga, J. E., Asadi-González, A. A., Martínez-Alvarado, J. R., Chávez-Baray, S. M., López, I. P., & González-Fagoaga, C. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.670400 · Cited by 29
Mexico’s Higher Education Students’ Experience During the Lockdown due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Zapata-Garibay, R., González-Fagoaga, J. E., Meza-Rodríguez, E. B., Salazar-Ramírez, E., López, I. P., & González-Fagoaga, C. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.683222 · Cited by 29 · cited 4×
“…2021); (b) students had a positive perception of online communication with classmates (Flores Ferro et al., 2021; Quispe-Prieto et al., 2021; Zapata-Garibay et al., 2021); (c) students showed high levels of online interaction through likes and shares (Alves et al., 2021) and (d) students exhibited…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlves, N., Carrazoni, G. S., Soares, C. B., da Rosa, A. C. D. S., Soares, N. M., & Mello‐Carpes, P. B. (2021) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00214.2020 · Cited by 28
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12952 · Cited by 25 · cited 2×
“The recent development of learning analytics offers tools for capturing and measuring students' online engagement during the learning process (Salas-Pilco & Yang, 2020) and receiving real-time feedback.”
BackgroundBoesch, I., Schwaninger, M., Weber, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2012) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9248-6 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“Moreover, the results were obtained after continuous and repeated revisions through discussion, doubt resolution and consensus building after considering all the feedback (Boesch et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHeurteloup, N. H., & Moustaghfir, K. (2020) · International Journal of Management in Education · doi:10.1504/ijmie.2020.105407 · Cited by 21
Influence of COVID-19 confinement on physics learning in engineering and science students
Mendoza-Lizcano, S. M., Alvarado, W. P., & Delgado, B. M. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1671/1/012018 · Cited by 19 · cited 3×
“In several of the reviewed studies, some students were emotionally affected by stress and anxiety (Lovón Cueva & Cisneros Terrones, 2020; Mendoza-Lizcano et al., 2020), which was a negative aspect of online learning during the long physical isolation period (Santos et al., 2021; Zúñiga Rodríguez &…”
BackgroundWilliams, M. E. (2017) · Journal of instructional pedagogies · Cited by 18
Santos, L. M., Grisales, D., & Rico, J. S. (2021) · Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social · doi:10.15366/riejs2021.10.1.009 · Cited by 15
la Fuente, C. D., Guadagnin, E. C., Kunzler, M. R., & Carpes, F. P. (2021) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00183.2020 · Cited by 15 · cited 4×
“Only three studies included graduate students (Bazán-Ramírez et al., 2020; Cárdenas Zea et al., 2021; De la Fuente et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialSalto, D. J. (2020) · eLearn · doi:10.1145/3424971.3421751 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“The ministries of education in Latin American countries issued the notice to suspend traditional classroom teaching in HEIs and implement online classes (Salto, 2020).”
BackgroundBazán-Ramírez, A., Morales, R. A. Q., Quispe, P. H., & Ango-Aguilar, H. (2020) · Propósitos y Representaciones · doi:10.20511/pyr2020.v8nspe3.659 · Cited by 14
Chávez-Miyauchi, T. E., Benítez-Rico, A., Alcántara-Flores, M., Vergara‐Castañeda, A., & Ogando-Justo, A. B. (2021) · Nova Scientia · doi:10.21640/ns.v13ie.2739 · Cited by 14 · cited 2×
“…attitudes of students toward online learning (Cárdenas Zea et al., 2021; De la Fuente et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021), video resources (Delgado, 2021), technology usage (Romero Alonso et al., 2021) and online courses (Faria et al., 2021; Chávez-Miyauchi et al., 2021; Flores Ferro et al., 2021).”
BackgroundExploring e-learning development: studies of ICT access and educational usage in Latin America
Chin-Roemer, R., DeCrease, B., & Gómez, R. (2011) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666911424076 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“Similarly, in Latin America, although some research has focused on student online learning experiences (Charbonneau-Gowdy, 2016; Chin-Roemer et al., 2011), the characteristics of student engagement in online leaning remain unclear.”
BackgroundThe Roles of Digital Literacy in Social Life of Youth
Martinović, D., Freiman, V., Lekule, C. S., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7659-4.ch009 · Cited by 11
OSCE 3D: a virtual clinical skills assessment tool for coronavirus pandemic times
Faria, A. L., Perdigão, A. C. B., Marçal, E., Kubrusly, M., Peixoto, R. A. C., & Peixoto, A. A. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica · doi:10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20200460.ing · Cited by 7
Equivariant Topological Quantum Field Theory in Dimension 2Preprint
Nadirashvili, N., & Vlăduţ, S. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1007/s4059 · Cited by 7
Understanding Latin America IPv6 connectivity: A preliminary exploration
Kiedanski, D., & Grampín, E. (2017) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society · doi:10.1109/sccc.2017.8405137 · Cited by 4 · cited 1×
“Thus, the decision makers in Latin America need to improve the network connectivity (Kiedanski & Grampín, 2017) to facilitate the delivery of learning activities to students in distant regions, making Internet services accessible to every citizen, as Internet access is part of the United Nations'…”
BackgroundFrom Face-to-Face Education to Online Education
Regalado-Pezúa, O., & Galeano, M. L. T. (2021) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7548-2.ch008 · Cited by 4 · cited 1×
“In contrast, the lack of efficient Internet access that causes the discontinuation of online classes can lower student engagement (Bali & Liu, 2018; Regalado-Pezua & Galeano, 2022).”
BackgroundFerro, E. F., Cid, F. M., Briceño, M., Duarte, S. A., Silva-Salse, Á., Castillo-Retamal, F., Flores, P., Cárcamo, F. P., Acevedo, V. B., Vera, G., et al. (2020) · Cited by 2
(2021) · doi:10.1021/acs
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Cabero J., 2018, Percepciones de profesores y estudiantes de la formación virtual y de las herramientas en ellas utilizadas [Teachers 'and students' perceptions of virtual training and the tools used in it], Diálogo Educativo, 18, 149
- Cárdenas Zea M. P., 2021, La educación virtual en tiempos del COVID‐19: Una experiencia en la maestría de Educación [Virtual education in times of COVID‐19: An experience in the Master of Education], Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 13, 243
- Charbonneau‐Gowdy P, 2016, Proceedings of the11th International Conference on e‐Learning, 37
- Domínguez‐Torres L. C., 2021, Aula invertida a distancia vs. aula invertida convencional: Un estudio comparativo [Remote flipped classroom vs. conventional flipped classroom: A comparative study], Iatreia, 34, 260, 10.17533/udea.iatreia.104 · DOI
- Ferreira D., 2018, Andragogy in the 21st century: Applying the assumptions of adult learning online, Language Research Bulletin, 32, 10
- Huang R. H., 2020, Guidance on flexible learning during campus closures: Ensuring course quality of higher education in COVID‐19 outbreak
- Knopf T., 2021, Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Social Media
- Molina Gutiérrez T. D. J., 2021, Crisis estudiantil en pandemia. ¿Cómo valoran los estudiantes universitarios la educación virtual? [Student crisis in the pandemic. How do university students value virtual education?], Revista Conrado, 17, 283
- Rodríguez Fernández R. M., 2021, Experiencias en Cuba sobre la utilización de métodos colaborativos de aprendizaje en asignaturas de la carrera Ciencias de la Información [Experiences in Cuba on the use of collaborative learning methods in Information Sciences subjects], Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 32
- 10.4185/RLCS‐2020‐1479 · DOI
- The World Bank, 2021, Latin America and the Caribbean: Tertiary education. Context
- Tyler R., 1969, Educational evaluation: New roles, new methods: The sixty‐eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II
- United Nations, 2015, Draft outcome document of the United Nations summit for the adoption of the post‐2015 development agenda A/69/L.85
- Willms J. D., 2009, What did you do in school today? Transforming through social, academic and intellectual engagement: First National Report
- Yuzhaninova E. R., 2018, 5th International Scientific Conference on Purposes, Tasks and Values of Education in Modern Conditions, 20
- Zúñiga Rodríguez M., 2021, El sentido escolar frente al COVID‐19. La percepción de estudiantes de universidades públicas en Hidalgo [The school sense in the face of COVID‐19. The perception of students from public universities in Hidalgo], Revista Conrado, 17, 46
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y · Cited by 458
Wang, X., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12874 · Cited by 172
Johar, N. A., Kew, S. N., Tasir, Z., & Koh, E. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107849 · Cited by 108
Younas, M. S., Noor, U., Zhou, X., Menhas, R., & Qingyu, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948061 · Cited by 107
“The features of students’ involvement in online learning remain understudied, and the factors impacting students’ satisfaction and achievement in online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic era and the link between these variables have to be identified and established (Gopal et al., 2021; Salas-Pilco et al., 2022).”
BackgroundAkram, H., & Li, S. (2024) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.1177/00315125241248709 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Central China Normal University (CN)
- Hang Seng University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Yuqin
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-15
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 593-619
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- PMC
- PMC9111674
- OpenAlex
- W4213050051
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 42
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62107020)
- Division of Undergraduate Education (ZNXBJY202108)
- Central China Normal University (1100/30106200286)
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (21YJA880078)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Keywords
- student engagement, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, Latin American higher education, behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, internet access, online education quality, emotional support for students, digital technologies in higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review